Flexible pedagogies: Challenges and solutions
Keywords:
Flexibility, Flexible pedagogies, Key challenges, Technology integration, Educational experienceAbstract
The concept of flexibility demands a redefinition of the roles played by both teachers and learners, requiring learners to exhibit higher levels of self-initiative, self-motivation, and self-control. The assumption that learners are actively engaged is fundamental. Teachers must transition from traditional instructional roles to take on more prominent positions as consultants, collaborators, instructors, and facilitators. The goal of flexible learning is to provide educational accessibility, personalization, and adaptability to various life situations. Granting learners increased flexibility places greater expectations on teachers, often necessitating additional time and effort. Interaction, perseverance, creativity, and innovation are not explicitly instructed; rather, they are inherent aspects within various teaching methods and methodologies. Ensuring equitable access to technology and resources is essential for bridging the digital divide. By addressing these challenges, educational institutions can foster dynamic and inclusive learning experiences that equip students for the complexities of the modern world.
Downloads
References
Ally, M., Grimus, M., & Ebner, M. (2014). Preparing teachers for a mobile world, to improve access to education. Prospects, 44(1), 43-59. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11125-014-9293-2
Andrade, M. S. (2023). Pedagogies and practices: An institutional framework for flexible learning. Journal of Higher Education Theory and Practice, 23(5), 106-114.
Baer, A. (2021). Gently stretching to reach all students: Inclusive learning through scaffolding and flexible pedagogy. College & Research Libraries News, 82(4), 182-185. https://doi.org/10.5860/crln.82.4.182
Barnett, L. (2018). Learning development. In I. M. Kinchin & N. E. Winstone (Eds.), Exploring pedagogic frailty and resilience (pp. 186–203). Brill.
Barnett, R. (2014). Conditions of flexibility. York: Higher Education Academy, 10, 1-88.
Barua, L., & Lockee, B. B. (2024). A review of strategies to incorporate flexibility in higher education course designs. Discover Education, 3(1), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44217-024-00213-8
Barua, L., & Lockee, B. B. (2024). A review of strategies to incorporate flexibility in higher education course designs. Discover Education, 3(1), 127. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44217-024-00213-8
Benade, L. (2019). Flexible learning spaces: Inclusive by design?. New Zealand Journal of Educational Studies, 54(1), 53-68. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40841-019-00127-2
Bennington, B., Tallantyre, F., & Le Cornu, A. (2013). Flexible learning: a practical introduction for students (pp. 7-12). The Higher Education Academy.
Bercasio, R. R. O. (2023). Flexible pedagogies during the educational disruption in Bicol, Philippines: Developing a practice-informed framework. In C. R. Pérez & M. M. C. Shohel (Eds.), Inclusive pedagogy in contemporary education. IntechOpen. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.113300
Bitar, N., & Davidovich, N. (2024). Transforming pedagogy: The digital revolution in higher education. Education Sciences, 14(8), 811. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14080811
Brekke, M., Torstveit, G., Køien Andersen, M., Kjosnes Fredsvik, L., Mijatović, A., Bulant, M., & Zhang, T. (2024). Flexible learning and teaching: Thematic Peer Group Report. European University Association. https://www.eua.eu/publications/reports/flexible-learning-and-teaching.html
Broodryk, J. (2015). Pedagogies that support flexible learning environments. Whakarongo School.
Butcher, J., & Marr, L. (2020). Bend me, shape me: Flexible pedagogies to widen participation and deliver on social justice. In C. Dennis, S. Abbott, R. Matheson, & S. Tangney (Eds.), Flexibility and pedagogy in higher education: Delivering flexibility in learning through online learning communities (pp. 11-21). Brill.
Casey, J., & Wilson, P. (2005). A practical guide to providing flexible learning in further and higher education. Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education. https://trustdr.digitalinsite.co.uk/outputs/Flex_Delivery_Guide.pdf
Chakrabarty, R. (2020, June 11). No Indian institute among top 100 in QS World University Rankings 2021: What is India doing wrong? India Today. https://www.indiatoday.in/education-today/news/story/qs-world-university-rankings-2021-no-indian-institute-among-top-100-1687870-2020-06-11
Collis, B., & Moonen, J. (2002). The contributing student: A pedagogy for flexible learning. Computers in the Schools, 19(3-4), 207-220. https://doi.org/10.1300/J025v19v03_16
Dikilitas, K., & Fructuoso, I. N. (2023). Conceptual framework for flexible learning design: The context of flipped classroom. USPS Press, 267, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.31265/usps.267 (Project No. 2022-1-ES01-KA220-HED-000085250, European Commission)
Dimitrova, M., Mimirinis, M., & Murphy, A. (2004, August). Evaluating the flexibility of a pedagogical framework for e-learning. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (pp. 291-295). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICALT.2004.1357422
Du Plessis, A. E. (2023). A Handbook for Retaining Early Career Teachers: Research-Informed Approaches for School Leaders. Taylor & Francis.
Du Plessis, A. E., Küng, E., & du Plessis, E. (2024). Challenges for pedagogical effectiveness in an ever-changing education landscape: conceptualisation of pedagogical mobility and flexibility as a context-consciousness. Education Sciences, 14(4), 349. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14040349
El Galad, A., Betts, D. H., & Campbell, N. (2024, April). Flexible learning dimensions in higher education: aligning students’ and educators’ perspectives for more inclusive practices. In Frontiers in Education (Vol. 9, p. 1347432). Frontiers Media SA.
Elkington, S. (2022). Shifts in pedagogy and flexible assessment: Integrating digital technology with good teaching and learning practice. In B. A. Brown & A. Irons (Eds.), The Emerald handbook of higher education in a post-COVID world: New approaches and technologies for teaching and learning (pp. 153–171). Emerald Publishing Limited.
Familoni, B. T., & Onyebuchi, N. C. (2024). Advancements and challenges in AI integration for technical literacy: a systematic review. Engineering Science & Technology Journal, 5(4), 1415-1430. https://doi.org/10.51594/estj.v5i4.1042
Glover, A., & Stewart, S. (2024). Using a blended distance pedagogy in teacher education to address challenges in teacher recruitment. Teaching Education, 35(1), 104-126. https://doi.org/10.1080/10476210.2023.2223526
Gordon, N. (2014). Flexible pedagogies: Technology-enhanced learning. The Higher Education Academy, 1(2), 2-14.
Grannäs, J., Frelin, A., & Östlin, T. (2025). Unpacking flexibility in innovative learning environments-teachers’ experiences in practice. Educational Studies, 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1080/03055698.2024.2448781
Hector-Alexander, A. (2019). Technology and the Curriculum: Summer 2019. Ontario Tech University.
Johnson-Eilola, J., & Selber, S. A. (2021). Strange days: creating flexible pedagogies for technical communication. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 35(1), 154-159.
Jones, B., & Walters, S. (2015). Flexible learning and teaching: looking beyond the binary of full-time/part-time provision in South African higher education. Critical Studies in Teaching and Learning, 3(1), 61-84. https://doi.org/10.14426/cristal.v3i1.29
Keele, S. (2007). Guidelines for performing systematic literature reviews in software engineering (EBSE Technical Report No. 5). Software Engineering Group, Keele University. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Barbara-Kitchenham/publication/302924724_Guidelines_for_performing_Systematic_Literature_Reviews_in_Software_Engineering/links/61712932766c4a211c03a6f7/Guidelines-for-performing-Systematic-Literature-Reviews-in-Software-Engineering.pdf
Kessels, G., Xu, K., Dirkx, K., & Martens, R. (2024). Flexible assessments as a tool to improve student motivation: An explorative study on student motivation for flexible assessments. Frontiers in Education, 9. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1290977
Khan, B. H. (2007). Flexible learning in an open and distributed environment. In B. H. Khan (Ed.), Flexible learning in an information society (pp. 1-17). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-59904-325-8.ch001
Kilag, O. K., Diano Jr, F., Bulilan, R., Allego, L., & Cañizares, M. C. (2024). Leadership strategies for building inclusive school communities: the challenges of managing diversity in schools. International Multidisciplinary Journal of Research for Innovation, Sustainability, and Excellence (IMJRISE), 1(1), 92-100.
King, E., Joy, M., Foss, J., Sinclair, J., & Sitthiworachart, J. (2015). Exploring the impact of a flexible, technology-enhanced teaching space on pedagogy. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 52(5), 522-535. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2014.896222
Kitchenham, B., & Charters, S. (2007). Guidelines for performing systematic literature reviews in software engineering (EBSE Technical Report EBSE-2007-01). Software Engineering Group, Keele University.
Morgan, C., & Bird, J. (2007). Flexible assessment: some tensions and solutions. In B. H. Khan, (Ed.), Flexible learning in an information society (pp. 247-259). IGI Global.
Munaji, M., Rohaeti, T., Mutadi, M., Sumliyah, S., & Kodirun, K. (2025). A literature review of flexibility in interactive mathematics classrooms: the role of teachers and students. Journal of Education and Learning (EduLearn), 19(2), 597-605.
Pérez-Garcias, A., Tur Ferrer, G., Villatoro Moral, S., & Darder-Mesquida, A. (2022). Flexible learning itineraries in digital environments for personalised learning in teacher training. RIED-Revista Iberoamericana de Educación a Distancia, 25(2), 175-193. https://doi.org/10.5944/ried.25.2.32326
Rafferty, J. M., Munday, J., & Buchan, J. (2013). Ten rules of thumb in blended and flexible learning: A study on pedagogies, challenges, and changing perspectives. In B. Tynan (Ed.), Outlooks and opportunities in blended and distance learning (pp. 35-49). IGI Global.
Ryan, A., & Cotton, D. (2013). Times of change: Shifting pedagogy and curricula for future sustainability. In S. Sterling, L. Maxey, & H. Luna (Eds.), The sustainable university: Process and prospects. Routledge.
Ryan, A., & Tilbury, D. (2013). Flexible pedagogies: New pedagogical ideas (pp.4-35). The Higher Education Academy. https://s3.eu-west-2.amazonaws.com/assets.creode.advancehe-document-manager/documents/hea/private/resources/npi_report_1568036616.pdf
Silva, R., Farias, C., & Mesquita, I. (2024). “It’s Good to Have a Voice”: What Do Students Think about the Impact of a Flexible Curricular Implementation of Student-Centered Pedagogies on Their Own Learning Experiences?. Education Sciences, 14(10), 1074.
Sitthiworachart, J., Joy, M., King, E., Sinclair, J., & Foss, J. (2022). Technology-supported active learning in a flexible teaching space. Education Sciences, 12(9), 634. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12090634
Slaughter, R. (2008). Futures education: Catalyst for our times. Journal of Futures Studies, 12(3), 15-30.
Swan, E., & Fox, S. (2009). Becoming flexible: Self‐flexibility and its pedagogies. British Journal of Management, 20, S149-S159. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8551.2008.00642.x
Tahir, S. I. (2024). Reviewing the impact of digital citizenship on academic performance of students. Emerging Learning Technologies, 1(1), 41–49.
Tahir, S. I. (2024). Societal and economic impact of Atmanirbhar Bharat: A long-term vision through education. In M. Upadhyay & F. A. Malik (Eds.), Empowering India’s future NEP, skill development and cultural expression (pp 17-30). Booksclinc publishing Chhattisgarh.
Tahir, S. I. (2025). Empowering Students Through Culturally Responsive Pedagogies. In Pedagogies of Compassion and Care in Education (pp. 87-104). IGI Global Scientific Publishing.
Tahir, S. I., & Jan, T. (2023). Pandemic perspectives: How students navigate social relationships. Education Mind, 2(2), 85-100.
Tahir, S. I., & Jan, T. (2024). Understanding factors affecting scholastic achievement of students: A review of the literature. IASSI Quarterly, 43 (3), 562-575.
Torell Palmquist, G., Hedenborg, S., Linnér, S., Rosén, A., & Solenes, O. (2025). Flexibility, creativity, and imagination–a frame factor analysis of riding lessons for young children. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 1-14.
Torrato, J. B., Prudente, M. S., & Aguja, S. E. (2020, January). Technology integration, proficiency and attitude: Perspectives from grade school teachers. In Proceedings of the 2020 11th International Conference on E-Education, E-Business, E-Management, and E-Learning (pp. 70-75).
Vadeboncoeur, J. A., & Padilla-Petry, P. (2017). Learning from teaching in alternative and flexible education settings. Teaching Education, 28(1), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1080/10476210.2016.1265928
Voogt, J., & Pareja Roblin, N. (2012). A comparative analysis of international frameworks for 21st century competences: Implications for national curriculum policies. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 44(3), 299–321. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2012.668938
Wanner, T., Palmer, E., & Palmer, D. (2024). Flexible assessment and student empowerment: advantages and disadvantages–research from an Australian university. Teaching in Higher Education, 29(2), 349-365. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2021.1989578
Xiao, Y., and Watson, M. (2017). Guidance on conducting a systematic literature review. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 39, 93-112. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X177 2397
Yesil, L. B., & Aras, İ. S. (2024). The significance of flexible learning spaces and student-centred pedagogies in school settings: A comparative case study. International Education Journal: Comparative Perspectives, 23(1), 1-24.
Downloads
How to Cite
Published
Issue
Section
Statistics
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Syed Tahir, Tasleema Jan
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
