Akman, C. (2024). Examining the effects of educational digital game-supported argumentation activities on 7th grade students' critical thinking skills and academic achievement. Master’s thesis, Bursa Uludağ University Institute of Educational Sciences, Bursa.

Arduç, M. A., & Kahraman, S. (2024). The effect of web 2.0 supported socio-scientific argumentation activities on students' science literacy, attitudes, critical thinking tendencies and decision-making skills. Journal of Uludag University Faculty of Education, 37(2), 604-629. https://doi.org/10.19171/uefad.1412412

Arslan, G., & Tüysüz, M. (2023). Investigation of the effects of socio-scientific topics taught in the scope of argumentation-based education supported by the storytelling technique on the development of 8th grade students' critical thinking skills, attitudes towards science and argumentation levels. Cumhuriyet International Journal of Education, 12(1), 104-118. https://doi.org/10.30703/cije.1170029

Aşık, F., Yıldız, A., Kılınç, S., Aytekin, N., Adalı, R., & Kurnaz, K. (2023). The impact of artificial intelligence on education. International Journal of Social and Humanities Sciences Research, 10(98), 2100–2107. Retrieved from https://zenodo.org/records/8307107

Aslan, S. (2014). Analysis of students’ written scientific argument generate and evaluation skills. Journal of Theory and Practice in Education, 10(1), 41-74. https://doi.org/10.17244/eku.23683

Atabey, N., & Topçu, M. S. (2017). The development of a socio-scientific issues-based curriculum unit for middle school students: Global warming issue. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 5(3), 153-170. https://doi.org/10.18404/ijemst.296027

Aydın Yalçın, G. (2019). The effect of argumentation based science learning approach on academic success and motivation of 9th grade students in a physics course. Master’s thesis, Gazi University Institute of Educational Sciences, Ankara.

Aydın, Ö., & Kaptan, F. (2014). Effect of argumentation on metacognition and logical thinking abilities in science – technology teacher candidate education and opinions about argumentation. Journal of Educational Sciences Research, 4(2), 163-188. http://dx.doi.org/10.12973/jesr.2014.42.10

Aydoğdu, Z. (2017). Investigation of effects the argumentation based science teaching on the academic success, motivation, interest and attitudes towards science. Master’s thesis, Sakarya University Institute of Educational Sciences, Sakarya.

Bahar, A. N. (2023). Investigating the effect of argument-based strategies for STEM infused science teaching approach on 6th grade students' achievement, entrepreneurship and motivation in the unit "Matter and heat". Master’s thesis, Marmara University Institute of Educational Sciences, İstanbul.

Bakdemir, S. (2024). The effect of the argumentation-based learning model on 7th grade students' written argument use levels, persuasive writing success and writing motivation. Master’s thesis. Ordu University Institute of Social Sciences, Ordu.

Başat, T. (2015). Exploring pre-license students' technological content knowledge and their self-efficacy: An application in Afyon Vocational School. Master’s thesis, Afyon Kocatepe University Institute of Science, Afyon.

Bell, P., & Linn, M. C. (2000). Scientific arguments as learning artifacts: designing for learning from the web with KIE. International Journal of Science Education, 22(8), 797-817. https://doi.org/10.1080/095006900412284

Bilasa, P., & Taşpınar, M. (2018). The effect of argumentation-based science learning approach on pre-service teachers' critical thinking skills and willingness to argue: The example of Gazi University. Ahi Evran University Journal of Kırşehir Faculty of Education, 19(1), 555-577.

Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2024). Sosyal bilimler için veri analizi el kitabı [Handbook of data analysis for the social sciences]. Ankara: Pegem.

Büyüköztürk, Ş., Kılıç Çakmak, E., Akgün, Ö. E., Karadeniz, Ş., & Demirel, F. (2024). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri [Scientific research methods]. Ankara: Pegem.

Cavagnetto, A. R. (2010). Argument to foster scientific literacy: A review of argument interventions in K-12 science contexts. Review of Educational Research, 80(3), 336–371. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654310376953

Çiçek Şentürk, Ö. (2020). The effect of argumentation-supported educational comics on students' environmental interests, motivation, and academic achievements and student experiences. Doctoral dissertation, Gazi University Institute of Educational Sciences, Ankara.

Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Crompton, H., Burke, D., & Gregory, K. H. (2017). The use of mobile learning in science: A systematic review. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 26(1), 56-70. https://10.1007/s10956-016-9651-y

Dawson, V. M., & Venville, G. (2010). Teaching strategies for developing students’ argumentation skills about socio scientific issues in high school genetics. Research in Science Education, 40, 133-148. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-008-9104-y

Deci, E. L., Vallerand, R. J., Pelletier, L. G., & Ryan, R. M. (1991). Motivation and education: The self-determination perspective. Educational Psychologist, 26(3-4), 325-346. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep2603&4_6

Dede, Y., & Yaman, S. (2008). A questionnaire for motivation toward science learning: A validity and reliability study. Necatibey Faculty of Education Electronic Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 2(1), 19-37.

Demir, K., Enderle, P., & Gül, T. (2017). Fizik öğretiminde argüman temelli sorgulama [Argument-based inquiry in physics education]. In A. İ. Şen & A. R. Akdeniz (Eds.), Fizik öğretimi [Physics Education] (pp. 199-225). Ankara: Pegem.

Demirbağ, M. (2019). Fen öğretiminde argümantasyon [Argumentation in science teaching]. In C. Aydoğdu & S. Kıngır (Eds.), Fen Öğretimi [Science education] (pp. 169-194). Ankara: Nobel.

Demirdöğen, B., Yeşiloğlu, S. N., & Köseoğlu, F. (2017). Argümantasyon ile kimya öğretimi [Teaching chemistry with argumentation]. In A. Ayas & M. Sözbilir (Eds.), Kimya öğretimi [Chemistry teaching] (pp. 337-365). Ankara: Pegem.

Driver, R., Newton, P., & Osborne, J. (2000). Establishing the norms of scientific argumentation in classrooms. Science Education, 84(3), 287-312. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(200005)84:3<287::AID-SCE1>3.0.CO;2-A

Duschl, A., Schweingruber, H., & Shouse A. (2007). Taking science to school: Learning and teaching science in grades K-8. Washington, DC: National Academies.

Er, S., & Kırındı, T. (2020). The impact of the argumentation method based science course on students’ science process skills. Gazi Journal of Education Sciences (GJES), 6(3), 317-343. https://dx.doi.org/110.30855/gjes.2020.06.03.004

Erduran, S., Simon, S., & Osborne, J. (2004). TAPping into argumentation: Developments in the application of Toulmin’s argument pattern for studying science discourse. Science Education, 88, 915-933. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20012

Gökmen, Ö. F., Duman, İ., & Horzum, M. B. (2016). Theories, changes, and new trends in distance education. Open Education Applications and Research Journal, 2(3), 29-51. Retrieved from https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/auad/issue/34059/376987

Güler, M. M. (2023). The effect of different argumentation-based applications on the students' conceptual learning and argument formation skills. Master’s thesis, Erciyes University Institute of Educational Sciences, Kayseri.

Günel, M., Kabataş-Memiş, E., & Büyükkasap, E. (2010). Effects of the science writing heuristic approach on primary school students’ science achievement and attitude toward Science Course. Education and Science, 35(155), 49-62. https://dx.doi.org/10.15390/ES.2010.848

Günel, M., Kıngır, S., & Geban, Ö. (2012). Analysis of argumentation and questioning patterns in argument based inquiry classrooms. Education and Science, 37(164), 316-330. https://doi.org/10.15390/ES.2012.1045

Güvercin, O., Tekkaya, C., & Sungur, S. (2010). A cross age study of elementary students’ motivation towards science learning. Hacettepe University Journal of Education, 39, 233-243.

Hiğde, E., & Aktamış, H. (2023). The effects of inquiry and argumentation-based training on argumentation, inquiry and science process skills. Pamukkale University Journal of Education, 59, 160-175. https://doi.org/10.9779/pauefd.1073144

Howard, J., Gagné, M., Morin, A. J. S., & Van Den Broeck, A. (2016). Motivation profiles at work: A self-determination theory approach. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 95(96), 74-89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. jvb.2016.07.004

İnan, A. N. (2024). Investigation of the effect of technology- supported science writing heuristic approach on pre-service science teachers' written argumentation, multiple representation and reasoning. Master’s thesis, Yozgat Bozok University Graduate Education Institute, Yozgat.

Jiménez-Aleixandre, M. P. (2008). Designing argumentation in learning environments. In S. Erduran & M. P. Jiménez-Aleixandre (Eds.), Argumentation in science education: Perspectives from classroom-based research (pp. 91-115). Dordrecht: Springer.

Jiménez-Aleixandre, M. P., & Erduran, S. (2008). Argumentation in science education: An overview. In S. Erduran & M. P. Jiménez-Aleixandre (Eds.), Argumentation in science education: Perspectives from classroom-based research (pp. 3-27). Dordrecht: Springer.

Kara, E. (2024). The effect of argumentation-based science learning approach used in 7th grade science course on students' science learning competence, motivation and achievement. Master’s thesis, Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart University Graduate School of Education, Çanakkale.

Kara, S., Yılmaz, S., & Kıngır, S. (2020). The effect of argumentation based science learning approach on the academic achievement and argumentation quality levels of primary students. Kastamonu Education Journal, 28(3), 1253-1267. https://doi.org/10.24106/kefdergi.3785

Karamustafaoğlu, O., Çakır, R., & Topuz, F. (2012, June). Investigating teachers' attitudes towards the use of materials and technology in science teaching. Paper presented in X. National Science and Mathematics Education Congress, Niğde Ömer Halis Demir University, Niğde.

Karcılı, I., & Sevim, S. (2024). The effect of argumentation-based sociobiological topic teaching on 7th grade students' argumentation levels, decision-making skills and decision-making styles. Pamukkale University Journal of Education [PUJE], 61, 389-413. https://doi.org/10.9779/pauefd.1435514

Keys, C. W., Hand, B., Prain, V., & Collins, S. (1999). Using the science writing heuristic as a tool for learning from laboratory investigations in secondary science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36(10), 1065–1084. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199912)36:10<1065::AID-TEA2>3.0.CO;2-I

Kılıç, S. (2013). Sampling methods. Journal of Mood Disorders, 3(1), 44-46. https://10.5455/jmood.20130325011730

Kingir, S., Geban, Ö., & Gunel, M., (2013). Using the science writing heuristic approach to enhance student understanding in chemical change and mixture. Research in Science Education, 43(4), 1645-1663.

Kıyıcı, G., & Yumuşak, A. (2005). The effects of computer assisted activity at science laboratory lesson on student's acquire; example of acid – base concept's and titration topic. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology,4(4), 130-134.

Korkmaz, S. (2020). The effect of technology assisted argumentation based teaching on technological pedagogical content knowledge self-assessments and conceptual understandings of teacher candidates. Doctoral dissertation, Kastamonu University Institute of Science, Kastamonu.

Krouska, A., Troussas, C., & Sgouropoulou, C. (2020). Usability and educational affordance of web 2.0 tools from teachers' perspectives. In Proceedings of the 24th Pan-Hellenic Conference on Informatics, 107-110. https://doi.org/10.1145/3437120.3437286

Kuhn, D., & Udell, W. (2003). The development of argument skills. Child Development,74(5), 1245–1260. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8624.00605

Kuhn, D., (2010). Teaching and learning science as argument. Science Education, 94(5), 810-824. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20395

Lawson, A. E. (2003). The nature and development of hypothetic-predictive argumentation with ımplications for science teaching. International Journal of Science Education, 25(11), 1387–1408. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069032000052117

Lazowski, R. A., & Hulleman, C. S. (2016). Motivation interventions in education: A meta-analytic review. Review of Educational Research, 86(2), 602-640. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654315617832

Markland, D., Ryan, R. M., Tobin, V. J., & Rollnick, S. (2005). Motivational Interviewing and Self–Determination Theory. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 24(6), 811-831. https://doi.org/10.1521/jscp.2005.24.6.811

Mayer, R. E. (2009). Multimedia learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University.

Means, B., Toyama, Y., Murphy, R., Bakia, M., & Jones, K. (2009). Evaluation of evidence based practices in online learning: A meta-analysis and review of online learning studies. U.S. Department of Education. Retrieved from https://repository.alt.ac.uk/629/

Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017–1054. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00684.x

Norris, S. P., & Phillips, L. M. (2003). How literacy in its fundamental sense is central to scientific literacy. Science Education, 87(2), 224-240. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10066

OECD. (2021). OECD digital education outlook 2021 pushing the frontiers with artificial intelligence, blockchain and robots. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/589b283f-en.

Öğreten, B., & Uluçınar Sağır, Ş. (2014). Examining the effectiveness of science teaching based on argumentation. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 11(1), 75-100. https://doi.org/10.12973/tused.10104a

Önder, F. (2024). Evaluation of high school students' opinions on technology-supported argumentation-based mathematics teaching. Master’s thesis, Dokuz Eylül University Institute of Educational Sciences, İzmir.

Ozan, C. (2009). Qualifications of the primary school teachers in terms of use of educational technologies (sample of Erzurum). Master’s thesis, Atatürk University Institute of Social Sciences, Erzurum.

Özdem Köse, Ö. (2019). The effect of technology assisted argumentation on the 7th grade achievement, conceptual understanding and attitude: Force and energy. Master’s thesis, Marmara University Institute of Educational Sciences, İstanbul.

Özdem Köse, Ö., Bayram, H., & Benzer, E. (2021). The effect of web 2.0 tools supported argumentation applications on middle school students’ achievements, technology and argumentative attitudes on force and energy topic. Erciyes Journal of Education, 5(2), 179-207. https://doi.org/10.32433/eje.913505

Özdem-Yılmaz, Y. (2017). Fen öğretiminde argümantasyon [Argumentation in science teaching]. In H. G. Hastürk (Eds.), Teoriden pratiğe fen bilimleri öğretimi [From theory to practice in science teaching] (pp. 275-307). Ankara: Pegem.

Polat, S. (2025). The effect of an argumentation-based flipped learning environment on 6th grade students' academic achievement, motivation, and self-efficacy in science course. Master’s thesis, Sivas Cumhuriyet University Institute of Educational Sciences, Sivas.

Ryan, R. M. (1995). Psychological needs and the facilitation of integrative processes. Journal of Personality, 63(3), 397-427. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1995.tb00501.x

Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 54-67. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1999.1020

Şahin, D. (2014). 4th and 5th grade students' argument structure. Doctoral dissertation, Gazi University Institute of Educational Sciences, Ankara.

Sampson, V., Enderle, P., Grooms, J., & Witte, S. (2013). Writing to learn by learning to write during the school science laboratory: Helping middle and high school students develop argumentative writing skills as they learn core ideas. Science Education, 97(5), 643-670. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21069

Scott, P. H., Asoko, H., & Leach, J. (2007). Students conceptions and conceptual learning in science. In S. K. Abell & N. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research in science education (pp. 31 – 56). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

Şeker Küçükoğlu, B. (2024). The effect of argumentation-supported peer education method on students' academic achievement and science motivation. Master’s thesis, Atatürk University Institute of Educational Sciences, Erzurum.

Şenel Çoruhlu, T., & Akyüz, M. (2021). The effect of argumentation-based learning environment on pre-service elementary teachers’ conceptual understanding: a case of genetically modified organism. Trakya Journal of Education, 11(2), 622-642. https://doi.org/10.24315/tred.664297

Sevigen, M. (2022). The effect of using Web 2.0 tools on students' digital citizenship level, academic achievement and course attitude in teaching of social studies course. Master’s thesis, Ondokuz Mayıs University Graduate School of Education, Samsun.

Simon, S., Erduran, S., & Osborne, J. (2006). Learning to teach argumentation: Research and development in the science classroom. International Journal of Science Education, 28, 235-260. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690500336957

Tezel, Ö. (2018). Argümantasyona fayalı fen öğretimi [Argumentation-based science teaching]. In O. Karamustafaoğlu, Ö. Tezel & U. Sarı (Eds.), Güncel yaklaşım ve yöntemlerle etkinlik destekli fen öğretimi [Activity-supported science teaching with current approaches and methods] (pp. 97-122). Ankara: Pegem.

Tezel, Ö., & Yılmaz, G., (2017). A review of argumentation based science education studies in Turkey. Journal of Research in Education and Teaching, 6(5), 146-160.

Tonus, F. (2012). Effect of the argumentation-based teaching to critical thinking and decision making skills on primary students. Master’s thesis, Hacettepe University Institute of Social Sciences, Ankara.

Torun, E. (2024). The effect of technology supported argumentation approach on students 'cognitive and affective skills. Doctoral dissertation, Atatürk University Institute of Educational Sciences, Erzurum.

Toulmin, S. E. (2003). The uses of argument. Cambridge: Cambridge University.

Ministry of National Education. (2024). Cumhuriyetin 100. yılında öğretmenlerin gözüyle teknoloji ve eğitim bölgesel çalıştayları raporu [Report on regional workshops on technology and education through the eyes of teachers on the 100th anniversary of the Republic]. Retrieved from https://www.meb.gov.tr/meb_iys_dosyalar/2024_03/15112203_OGRETMENLERIN_GOZUYLE_TEKNOLOJI_VE_EGITIM_BOLGESEL_CALISTAYLARI_RAPORU.pdf.

Türkmenoğlu, M. (2022). The effect of argumentation studies in mathematics education on problem solving success, metacognitive skills and motivations of primary school students. Master’s thesis, Çukurova University Institute of Social Sciences, Adana.

Ulu, C. (2019). The relationship between the quality of the arguments created by the students in science and concept teaching levels. International Journal of Science and Education, 1(1), 11-24.

Ulu, C., & Bayram, H. (2014). Effects of implementation instruction based approach known as the science writing heuristic on metacognitive awareness and skills. Turkish International Journal of Special Education and Guidance & Counselling, 3(1), 68–80.

Vansteenkiste, M., & Ryan, R. M. (2013). On psychological growth and vulnerability: Basic psychological need satisfaction and need frustration as a unifying principle. Journal of Psychotherapy Integration, 23(3), 263-280. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032359

Wigfield, A., & Wentzel, K.R. (2007). Introduction to motivation at school: Interventions that work. Educational Psychologist, 42(4), 191-196. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520701621038

Wojciechowski, R., & Cellary, W. (2013). Evaluation of learners’ attitude toward learning in ARIES augmented reality environments. Computers and Education, 68, 570–585. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.02.014

Yenigün, R. (2024). The effect of technology-supported argumentation method on secondary school students' academic success, creativity and argumentation skills in the systems unit in our body. Master’s thesis, Balıkesir University Institute of Science, Balıkesir.

Yetkil, K. (2021). The effect of argumentation model on reasoning and academic achievement in the unit of "pressure". Master’s thesis, Atatürk University Institute of Social Sciences, Erzurum.

Yıldırım, H. İ., & Karataş, F. (2018). Investigation of secondary school students’ motivation toward science learning according to some variables. The Journal of Academic Social Science, 65, 164-187. http://dx.doi.org/10.16992/ASOS.13377

Yıldırır, H. E., & Nakiboğlu, C. (2014). Examination of chemistry teachers and preservıce teachers’argumentation processes used in their courses. Abant İzzet Baysal University Journal of Faculty of Education, 14(2), 124-154.

Yıldız, S. (2017). Sampling problems in social sciences: A holistic view to the sampling theory from quantitative and qualitative paradigms. The Journal of Kesit Academy, 3(11), 421-442.

Yılmaz, Z. A., & Batdı, V. (2016). A meta-analytic and thematic comparative analysis of the integration of augmented reality applications into education. Education and Science, 41(188), 273-289. https://doi.org/10.15390/EB.2016.6707

Yüksel-Arslan, P. (2013). Eğitim amaçlı dijital öykünün hazırlanması ve kullanılması: TPAB temelli örnek bir fen bilgisi eğitimi uygulaması [Preparation and use of digital stories for educational purposes: A sample science education application based on TPACK]. In T. Yanpar-Yelken, H. Sancar-Toprak & S. Özgelen, L. İncikabı (Eds.), Fen ve matematik eğitiminde teknolojik pedagojik alan bilgisi temelli öğretim tasarımları [Technological pedagogical content knowledge based instructional designs in science and mathematics education] (pp. 105-128). Ankara: Anı.

Zhou, G. (2010). Conceptual change in science: A process of argumentation. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 6(2), 101-110. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/75231

Zohar, A., & Nemet, F. (2002). Fostering students' knowledge and argumentation skills through dilemmas in human genetics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(1), 35-62. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.10008