Education Mind

Research Article Open Access

Ministry of National Education reward system: A holistic review based on educators' views

Sevgi Yıldız , Serkan Şeker

Abstract

Rewarding plays a crucial role in motivating employees, increasing productivity, and ensuring success in educational organizations. The Ministry of National Education's (MoNE) reward system consists of three stages: achievement certificates, superior achievement certificates, and rewards (salary awards). This study aims to reveal the views of employees of MoNE’s provincial organizations, including teachers, school principals, branch managers, and district national education directors, on the current reward system. The study was designed as qualitative research with a basic qualitative research pattern. The study group consisted of 20 participants, including six teachers, six school principals, five branch managers, and three district national education directors, all working in Ordu province during the 2024-2025 academic year. The data was collected through semi-structured interviews using an interview form prepared by the researchers. The participants were selected based on the maximum variation sampling method, a purposive sampling technique, and the data were analysed through content analysis. The results indicated that while the MEB reward system positively affects the motivation of employees, there were differences in views between administrators and teachers regarding the fairness of evaluations. It was suggested that additional points should be awarded in certain cases, provided the certificates were earned justly. The current reward system was found to be deemed appropriate by administrators but not by teachers. Employees believed that achievement certificates were not granted based on objective criteria, and it would be more appropriate to increase the influence of school or district management in issuing these certificates. Furthermore, it was noted that there were different practices regarding achievement certificates and rewards across various provinces and districts, and standardization was needed in this regard. In conclusion, recommendations were made to align the reward system with the goals and personnel of the Ministry of National Education, ensuring that the process is carried out in an objective, fair, and transparent manner.

Keywords: Ministry of National Education Reward system Provincial organization Employee motivation

References

Adams, J. S. (1965). Inequity in social exchange. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 267-299). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60108-2

Argon, T. (2016). According to teachers' opinions, favoritism behaviors of administrators in primary schools. Kastamonu Education Journal, 24(1), 233-250.

Armstrong, M., & Cummins, A. (2011). The reward management toolkit (1st ed.). Kogan Page.

Armstrong, M., Cummins, A., Hastings, S., & Wood, W. (2003). Job evaluation a guide to achieving equal pay. Kogan Page Limited.

Balcı, E. (1989). Motivation in management, awards and the situation in the Turkish education system. Hacettepe University Journal of Education Faculty, (4), 127-135.

Bansal, H. S., Mendelson, M. B., & Sharma, B. (2001). The impact of internal marketing activities on external marketing outcomes. Journal of Quality Management, 6(2), 61-76. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1084-8568(01)00029-3

Barutçugil, İ. (2004). Strategic human resources management. Kariyer Publications.

Budak, G., Arpacı, S. Ç., & Tolay, E. (2017). Links between performance and competency-based pay and reward management. Ömer Halisdemir University Journal of the Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, 10(4), 15-34. https://doi.org/10.25287/ohuiibf.336790

Çelebi, N., Vuranok, T. T., & Hasekioglu, T. İ. (2015). Teachers' views on the reward system in primary and secondary schools. Mehmet Akif Ersoy University Journal of Education Faculty, 34, 75-104.

Çelik, M. (2006). Opinions of teachers and administrators working in primary schools on the evaluation of teacher performance with multiple sources [Master's thesis, Yüzüncü Yıl University].

Çelikezen, M. (2015). Administrators' views on the award system of the Ministry of National Education, the case of Bursa province [Master's thesis, Uşak University]. Council of Higher Education National Thesis Center. https://tez.yok.gov.tr

Çiçek, A. (2002). Administrators' and teachers' views on the methods used by primary school administrators to motivate classroom teachers, the case of Rize province [Doctoral dissertation, Ankara University].

Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative research methods: Qualitative research and research design according to five approaches (M. Tam & S. B. Demir, Trans.). Siyasal Kitabevi.

Erdemir, E. (2012). Rewarding. In S. Benligiray (Ed.), Compensation and reward management (pp. 114-139). Anadolu University Press.

Fındıkçı, İ. (2009). Human resource management. Alpha Publications.

Herzberg, F. (1968). Work and the nature of man. World Publishing Company.

Kohn, A. (1993, September). Why incentive plans cannot work. Harvard Business Review. https://hbr.org/1993/09/why-incentive-plans-cannot-work

Küçükçene, M. (2017). The phenomenon of justice in educational administration [Master's thesis, Kırıkkale University].

Lavy, V. (2007). Using performance-based pay to improve the quality of teachers. Future of Children, 27(1), 87-109.

Luthans, F. (1997). Organizational behavior. International Editions Management Series, Inc.

Luthans, F., & Stajkovic, A. D. (2000). The impact of recognition on employee performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(2), 255.

Merriam, S. B. (2013). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation (S. Turan, Trans.). Nobel Academic Publishing.

Ministry of National Education. (2023). Directive on awarding achievement, certificate of excellence and awards to the personnel of the Ministry of National Education.

Ministry of National Education. (2025). National education statistics: Formal education 2021/2022, 2022/2023, 2023/2024. Ministry of National Education Strategy Development Presidency Publications.

Önderoğlu, S. (2010). Links between perceptions of organizational justice, work-family conflict, and perceived organizational support [Master's thesis, Ankara University].

Patton, M. Q. (2014). Qualitative research and evaluation methods. Sage Publications.

Sabancı, A. (1999). The level of importance of the reward system in primary schools for teachers and vice principals, the level of meeting the requirements and providing job satisfaction [Doctoral dissertation, Hacettepe University]. Council of Higher Education National Thesis Center. https://tez.yok.gov.tr

Sarpkaya, R. (2001). Discipline and rewarding practices for primary and secondary school teachers are an example of the central district of Manisa [Master's thesis, Dokuz Eylül University]. Council of Higher Education National Thesis Center. https://tez.yok.gov.tr

Sarpkaya, R., Yengin-Sarpkaya, P., Yılmaz, T., & Altun, B. (2016). Rewarding practices for instructors. Ahi Evran University Kırşehir Faculty of Education Association (Kefad), 17(2), 473-493.

Seale, C. (1999). Quality in qualitative research. Qualitative Inquiry, 5(4), 465-478.

Serinkan, C., & Yurtseven, S. (2021). Organizational career management and organizational commitment. Paradigma Academy.

Sharp, A. (2010). The level of motivation of teachers and administrators in secondary schools of rewarding, the case of Ankara [Master's thesis, Gazi University]. Council of Higher Education National Thesis Center. https://tez.yok.gov.tr

Şenufuk, Y. (2004). Administrators' and teachers' views on the motivation of teachers by other incentives with official awards [Master's thesis, Abant İzzet Baysal University]. Council of Higher Education National Thesis Center. https://tez.yok.gov.tr

Tonbul, Y. (2002). The example of teacher rewarding approach based on the effectiveness of rewarding practices and teaching performance for primary school teachers and administrators [Doctoral dissertation, Dokuz Eylül University]. Council of Higher Education National Thesis Center. https://tez.yok.gov.tr

Yardibi, N. (2018). The effect of teachers' satisfaction levels with administrators on their job performance. Mersin University Journal of the Faculty of Education, 14(1), 426-435. https://doi.org/10.17860/mersinefd.401087

Yego, E. M. (2013). Influence of teacher reward system on employees output: A case of public primary schools, Turbo Division, Uasin Gishu County, Kenya [Unpublished master’s thesis, University of Nairobi].

Yıldırım, A., & Şimşek, H. (2013). Qualitative research methods in social sciences. Seçkin Publications.

Yıldırım, M. C. (2008). Primary school teachers' and administrators' views on teachers' rewards. Educational Administration in Theory and Practice, 56(56), 663-690.

Yılmaz, M. F. (2019). The effect of the reward system on the motivation levels of school administrators and teachers [Master's thesis, Harran University]. Council of Higher Education National Thesis Center. https://tez.yok.gov.tr

Ministry of National Education reward system: A holistic review based on educators' views

Abstract

References

Suggested Article

Cookie Notice