Alignment of the science curriculum with 21st-century educational goals: Teachers' evaluations
Authors
-
Melike Güzin SemercioğluGümüşhane University, Gümüşhane, Türkiye
DOI:
10.58583/EM.4.1.7Keywords:
Science curriculum, 21st-century skills, Teachers' perspectivesAbstract
This study evaluates the alignment of the science curriculum in Turkey with 21st-century educational goals based on teachers' perspectives. Conducted using a qualitative case study method, structured interviews were held with 20 science teachers from various regions, and the data were analysed using descriptive and content analysis techniques. Findings indicate that the curriculum's dense learning objectives result in time constraints, while the lack of concrete materials and technological infrastructure adversely impacts learning processes. Additionally, limitations were identified in fostering critical thinking, problem-solving, and hands-on learning skills. Teachers emphasized the need for a simplified curriculum, more opportunities for practical learning, integration of digital tools, and professional development programs for teachers. In conclusion, making the curriculum more flexible, technology-driven, and tailored to individual needs is critical to equipping students with 21st-century skills.
Downloads
References
Aksoy, N., & Küçük Demir, B. (2019). The effect of designing digital games on candidates' creativity in mathematics education. Gazi University Gazi Education Journal, 169. https://doi.org/10.17152/gefad.421615
Bakar, E. (2023). Interdisciplinary linkage for skill development in science education. Milli Eğitim Journal [National Education Journal], 52(1), 513-536. https://doi.org/10.37669/milliegitim.1309008
Beetham, H., & Sharpe, R. (2013). Rethinking Pedagogy for a Digital Age: Designing for 21st Century Learning. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203078952
Bümen, T. N., Ateş, A., Çakar, E., Ural, G., et al. (2012). Teacher professional development in the Turkish context: Issues and recommendations. Milli Eğitim Journal [National Education Journal], 42(194), 31-50. Retrieved from https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/milliegitim/issue/36174/406732
Bybee, R. W. (2010). Advancing STEM education: A 2020 vision. Technology and Engineering Teacher, 70(1), 30-35.
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Çepni, S. (2020). Teaching science and technology. Pegem Akademi.
Çiftçi, S., Sağlam, A., & Yayla, A. (2021). Student, teacher, and learning environment in the context of 21st-century skills. RumeliDE Journal of Language and Literature Studies, (24), 718-734. https://doi.org/10.29000/rumelide.995863.
Darling-Hammond, L., et al. (2017). Effective Teacher Professional Development. Palo Alto, CA: Learning Policy Institute.
Gül, S. S., & Nizam, Ö. K. (2021). Discourse and content analysis in social sciences. Pamukkale University Journal of Social Sciences Institute, 42, 181-198. https://doi.org/10.30794/pausbed.803182
Güllü, H & Akçay, A.O. (2022). The Investigation of the Relationship Between Primary School Teachers' Awareness of 21st Century Skills and FETEMM. Uşak University Journal of Social Sciences,15(1), 1-15. Retrieved from https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article-file/1215289
Hamarat, E. (2019). Education policies in Turkey focused on 21st-century skills. Education and Social Policies, 272. https://www.setav.org/assets/uploads/2019/04/272A.pdf
Hattie, J. & Yates, G.C.R. (2013). Visible Learning and the Science of How We Learn. Routledge: London https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315885025
Ilgar, R. (2023). Regional disparities in education in Turkey. International Journal of Social Sciences Education, 9(2), 20-44. https://doi.org/10.47615/issej.1329419
Kalemkuş, J. (2021). Examining the science education curriculum outcomes in terms of 21st-century skills. Anadolu Journal of Educational Sciences International, 11(1), 63-87. https://doi.org/10.18039/ajesi.800552
Kaymaz, A., & Atmaca, T. (2022). Some pedagogical outcomes of various inequalities in education and their effects on the classroom environment. Inönü University Journal of Education Faculty, 23(3), 1870-1897. https://doi.org/10.17679/inuefd.1169970
Keçeci, G., & Kavukçu, B. (2023). Science teachers and 21st-century skills. IKSAD Publishing House.
Laurillard, D. (2012). Teaching as a Design Science: Building Pedagogical Patterns for Learning and Technology. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203125083
Metin, M., Güler, M. M., & Çevik, A. (2023). Opinions of science teachers who have received STEM education on 21st-century skills. Studies in Educational Research Development, 7(1), 1-29. Retrieved from https://serd.artvin.edu.tr/tr/download/article-file/2853182
Ministry of National Education [MEB]. (2023). Research Report on 21st-Century Skills and Values.
OECD. (2020). Education at a Glance 2020: OECD Indicators. Paris: OECD Publishing
Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research & evaluation methods. Sage Publications.
Rotherham, A. J., & Willingham, D. (2010). 21st-century skills: The challenges ahead. Educational Leadership, 67(1), 16-21.
Saavedra, A. R., & Opfer, V. D. (2012). Learning 21st-century skills requires 21st-century teaching. Phi Delta Kappan, 93(3), 8-13. https://doi.org/10.1177/003172171209400203
Schleicher, A. (2018). Teaching for the Future: Effective Classroom Practices to Transform Education. OECD Publishing. Retrieved from https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/teaching-for-the-future_9789264293243-en.html
Thai N.T.T., De Waver, B. & Valcke, M. (2017). The impact of a flipped classroom design on learning performance in higher education: Looking for the best “blend” of lectures and guiding questions with feedback. Computers & Education, 107, 113-126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.01.003
Trilling, B., & Fadel, C. (2009). 21st century skills: Learning for life in our times. Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Twin Science. (2024a). Frequently asked questions about the new curriculum draft. Retrieved from https://www.twinscience.com/tr/blog/yeni-mufredat-taslagiyla-ilgili-sikca-sorulan-sorular/
Twin Science. (2024b). Turkey's Century Maarif Model and New Curriculum: New Approaches in Science Education. Retrieved from https://www.twinscience.com/tr/blog/turkiye-yuzyili-maarif-modeli-ve-yeni-mufredat-fen-bilimleri-egitiminde-yeni-yaklasimlar/
UNESCO. (2015). Education for All 2015 National Review: Equity and inclusion in education. UNESCO Institute for Statistics.
Uysal, Ö. (2021). A qualitative study on 21st-century skills gained through project-based learning. International Science and Education Journal, 4(2), 85-110. https://doi.org/10.47477/ubed.952556
Ülger, B. (2021). Science literacy. In Ü. Ormancı & S. Çepni (Eds.), From theory to practice: 21st-century skills and teaching (pp. 103-128). Nobel Publishing.
Yeşilbaş Özenç, Ö. (2023). How to use case study design in educational research? Journal of Search for Excellence in Qualitative Research in Education, 1(2), 57-67.
Yıldırım, A., & Şimşek, H. (2008). Qualitative research methods in social sciences (6th ed.). Ankara: Seçkin Publishing.
Yıldırım, A., & Şimşek, H. (2021). Qualitative research methods in social sciences. Seçkin Publishing.
Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). SAGE Publications. https://uk.sagepub.com/en-gb/eur/case-study-research-and-applications/book250150
Yüksel, E. (2019). Content analysis applications, issues, and solutions in communication research in Turkey. In International Euroasia Congress on Scientific Researches and Recent pp. 134-152. Baku: Khazar University.
Yüksel, R., Yılmaz, M., & Kurt, M. (2024). An analysis of the learning outcomes of the primary school science curriculum (2013 and 2018) in terms of learning and renewal skills. Basic Education Journal, 21, 28-41. https://doi.org/10.52105-temelegitim.21.3
Downloads
How to Cite
Published
Issue
Section
Statistics
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Melike Güzin Semercioğlu
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
