The use of argumentation-based teaching model in education: A bibliometric research
Authors
-
İzzet ŞerefFaculty of Education, Sivas Cumhuriyet University, Sivas, Türkiye
DOI:
10.58583/EM.4.1.9Keywords:
Argumentation, Educational research, Bibliometrics, Bibliometric analysisAbstract
The aim of this study is to reveal the trends of educational research on argumentation listed in the Web of Science database based on bibliometric parameters and to draw a direction for future research. The research was conducted in accordance with the bibliometric paradigm. The scope of the study consists of 3468 educational articles indexed in Web of Science. Bibliometric measures were used to analyse the data obtained. As a result of the research, it was determined that there has been a significant increase in the number of publications since 2005 and the number of citations has increased at the same rate. The most productive country is the United States of America, the most productive author is Katherine L. McNeil, and the most productive institution is State University System of Florida. The journal that publishes the most articles is the International Journal of Science Education. The trending subject areas were science education, self-regulated learning and teacher education. The most cited article is “Establishing the norms of scientific argumentation in classrooms” produced by Driver et al. in 2000. The core keyword is argumentation. However, other core concepts are science education, critical thinking, argumentative writing and socioscientific issues. Popular keywords are argumentative writing, second language writing, writing assessment, writing performance, argumentative essays, academic language, metadiscourse, reading comprehension and corpus linguistics.
Downloads
References
Admoko, S., Mukhayyarotin, N. R. J., & Hariyono, E. (2021, December). Bibliometric profile of science education research on argumentation and the contribution of Indonesia. In International Joint Conference on Science and Engineering 2021 (IJCSE 2021) (pp. 502-509). Atlantis Press.
Al, U. & Coştur, R. (2007). Türk Psikoloji Dergisi’nin bibliyometrik profile [Bibliometric profile of Turkish Journal of Psychology]. Türk Kütüphaneciliği, 21(2), 142-163.
Al, U. & Tonta, Y. (2004). Atıf Analizi: Hacettepe Üniversitesi kütüphanecilik bölümü tezlerinde atıf yapılan kaynaklar [Citation Analysis: Sources cited in Hacettepe University Department of Librarianship theses]. Bilgi Dünyası, 5(1), 19-47.
Al, U. (2012). Avrupa Birliği ülkeleri ve Türkiye’nin yayın ve atıf performansı [Publication and citation performance of European Union countries and Turkey]. Bilig, 62, 1-20.
Alsharif, A. H., Salleh, N. Z. M., Baharun, R., & Alharthi, R. H. E. (2021). Neuromarketing research in the last five years: A bibliometric analysis. Cogent Business & Management, 8(1), 1978620. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2021.1978620
Arslan, G. & Tüysüz, M. (2023). Hikâyelendirme tekniği ile desteklenen argümantasyon temelli eğitim kapsamında öğretilen sosyo-bilimsel konuların 8. sınıf öğrencilerinin, eleştirel düşünme becerilerine, fene karşı tutumlarına ve argümantasyon seviyelerinin gelişimlerine olan etkisinin incelenmesi [Investigating the effect of socio-scientific topics taught within the scope of argumentation-based education supported by storytelling technique on 8th grade students' critical thinking skills, attitudes towards science and development of argumentation levels]. Cumhuriyet Uluslararası Eğitim Dergisi, 12 (1), 104-118. https://doi.org/10.30703/cije.1170029
Ashel, H., Hamidah, I., Anwar, S., & Muslim, M. (2024). Research trends and opportunities of argumentation based learning for solving problems in physics learning: A bibliometric analysis. Jurnal Eksakta Pendidikan (JEP), 8(2), 99-114. https://doi.org/10.24036/jep/vol8-iss2/941
Bamberg, M. & Georgakopoulou, A. (2008). Small stories as a new perspective in narrative and identity analysis. Text & Talk, 28(3), 377-396. https://doi.org/10.1515/TEXT.2008.018
Becerikli, Y. S. (2013). Türkiye’de sağlık iletişimi üzerine yazılan lisansüstü tezlerin bibliyometrik analizi eleştirel bir bakış [A critical review of bibliometric analysis of postgraduate theses on health communication in Turkey]. Ankara Sağlık Hizmetleri Dergisi, 12(2), 25-36.
Bråten, I., Britt, M. A., Strømsø, H. I., & Rouet, J. F. (2011). The role of epistemic beliefs in the comprehension of multiple expository texts: Toward an integrated model. Educational Psychologist, 46(1), 48-70.
Çavuşoğlu, E. C., & Akkaş, Ö. A. (2025). Yoğun bakım hemşirelerinin enteral beslenme uygulamaları konusunda yapılan araştırmaların bibliyometrik analizi: Web of Science örneği [Bibliometric analysis of studies on enteral nutrition practices of intensive care nurses: Web of Science example]. Sağlık Bilimlerinde Değer, 15(1), 127-135. https://doi.org/10.33631/sabd.1540265
Chuang, P. L., & Yan, X. (2023). Connecting source use and argumentation in L2 integrated argumentative writing performance. Journal of Second Language Writing, 60, 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. jslw.2023.101003
Clark, D. B., Sampson, V., Weinberger, A., & Erkens, G. (2007). Analytic frameworks for assessing dialogic argumentation in online learning environments. Educational Psychology Review, 19, 343-374.
Dawson, V., & Venville, G. J. (2009). High‐school students’ informal reasoning and argumentation about biotechnology: An indicator of scientific literacy? International Journal of Science Education, 31(11), 1421-1445. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690801992870
Deane, P. (2013). On the relation between automated essay scoring and modern views of the writing construct. Assessing Writing, 18(1), 7-24.
Degano, C. (2016). Corpus linguistics and argumentation: Retrieving argumentative patterns in UK prime ministerial debates. Journal of Argumentation in Context, 5(2), 113-138. https://doi.org/10.1075/jaic.5.2.01deg.
Deng, Z., Uccelli, P., & Snow, C. (2022). Diversity of Advanced Sentence Structures (DASS) in writing predicts argumentative writing quality and receptive academic language skills of fifth-to-eighth grade students. Assessing Writing, 53, 100649. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2022.100649.
Driver, R., Newton, P., & Osborne, J. (2000). Establishing the norms of scientific argumentation in classrooms. Science Education, 84(3), 287-312.
Durkin, K. (2008). The adaptation of East Asian masters students to western norms of critical thinking and argumentation in the UK. Intercultural Education, 19(1), 15-27.
Ellegaard, O., & Wallin, J. A. (2015). The bibliometric analysis of scholarly production: How great is the impact?. Scientometrics, 105, 1809-1831. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1645-z.
Engle, R. A., & Conant, F. R. (2002). Guiding principles for fostering productive disciplinary engagement: Explaining an emergent argument in a community of learners classroom. Cognition and instruction, 20(4), 399-483.
Erişen, O. (2025). Dijital dönüşüm ışığında iç denetim üzerine bibliyometrik analiz yaklaşımı [A bibliometric analysis approach on internal audit in the light of digital transformation]. Denetişim, (32), 108-130. https://doi.org/10.58348/denetisim.1530516.
Erkol, M., Kışoğlu, M., & Gül, Ş. (2017). Argümantasyon tabanlı bilim öğrenme yaklaşımı rapor formatının öğretmen adaylarının başarılarına ve fen bilgisi laboratuvarına yönelik tutumlarına etkisi [The effect of argumentation-based science learning approach report format on pre-service teachers’ achievement and attitudes towards science laboratory]. İlköğretim Online, 16(2), 614-627. https://doi.org/10.17051/ilkonline.2017.304723.
Evagorou, M. & Osborne, J. (2013), Exploring young students' collaborative argumentation within a socioscientific issue. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 50, 209-237. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21076
Glänzel, W., & Schoepflin, U. (1999). A bibliometric study of reference literature in the sciences and social sciences. Information Processing & Management, 35(1), 31-44.
Gordon, N. J., Nucci, L. P., West, C. K., Hoerr, W. A., Uğuroğlu, M. E., Vukosavich, P. & Tsai, S. L. (1984). Productivity and citations of educational research: Using educational psychology as the data base. Educational Researcher, 13(7), 14-20. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X013007014.
Gregory, M. & Holloway, M. (2005). The debate as a pedagogic tool in social policy for social work students. Social Work Education, 24(6), 617-637.
Hallinger, P., & Chatpinyakoop, C. (2019). A bibliometric review of research on higher education for sustainable development, 1998–2018. Sustainability, 11(8), 2401. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11082401.
Hand, B., & Keys, C. W. (1999). Inquiry investigation: A new approach to laboratory reports. The Science Teacher, 66(4), 27.
Hasançebi, F. (2014). Argümantasyon tabanlı bilim öğrenme yaklaşımının öğrencilerin fen başarıları, argüman oluşturma becerileri ve bireysel gelişimleri üzerine etkisi [The effect of argumentation-based science learning approach on students’ science achievement, argumentation skills and individual development], [Unpublished doctoral thesis]. Atatürk University.
Hotamışlı, M. & Erem, I. (2014). Muhasebe ve Finansman Dergisi'nde yayınlanan makalelerin bibliyometrik analizi [Bibliometric analysis of articles published in Journal of Accounting and Finance]. Journal of Accounting & Finance, 63, 1-19. https://doi.org/10.25095/mufad.396474.
Huang, C., Yang, C., Wang, S., Wu, W., Su, J., & Liang, C. (2020). Evolution of topics in education research: A systematic review using bibliometric analysis. Educational Review, 72(3), 281-297. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2019.1566212.
Jeliazkova, M. & Westerheijden, D. F. (2002). Systemic adaptation to a changing environment: Towards a next generation of quality assurance models. Higher Education, 44, 433–448. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1019834105675.
Johns, A. M. (2017). Augmenting argumentation in second language writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 36, 79-80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2017.05.005.
Kartika, H., Budiarto, M.T., Fuad, Y., & Bonyah, E. (2023). Bibliometrics analysis of research on argumentation in mathematics education. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science, and Technology (IJEMST), 11(5), 1346-1365. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijemst.2904.
Khan, A., Goodell, J. W., Hassan, M. K., & Paltrinieri, A. (2022). A bibliometric review of finance bibliometric papers. Finance Research Letters, 47, 102520. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2021.102520.
Kıdak, L. B., Demir, H. & Özdemir, E. (2017). Bilimsel haritalama yöntemiyle hastane yönetimi alanındaki tematik değişimin analizi [Analyzing thematic change in the field of hospital management using scientific mapping]. Genel Tıp Dergisi, 27(2), 43-50.
Kılıçaslan, G., Can, H., & Çetinkaya, T. (2025). Açık ve uzaktan öğrenme ortamlarında öğrenim terki üzerine yapılan çalışmaların bibliyometrik analizi: Scopus örneği [A bibliometric analysis of studies on learning dropout in open and distance learning environments: Scopus example]. Açıköğretim Uygulamaları ve Araştırmaları Dergisi, 11(1), 62-87. https://doi.org/10.51948/auad.1556844.
Kim, J. S., Relyea, J. E., Burkhauser, M. A., Scherer, E., & Rich, P. (2021). Improving elementary grade students’ science and social studies vocabulary knowledge depth, reading comprehension, and argumentative writing: A conceptual replication. Educational Psychology Review, 33(4), 1935-1964. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-021-09609-6.
Kim, M. C. & Hannafin, M. J. (2011). Scaffolding problem solving in technology-enhanced learning environments (TELEs): Bridging research and theory with practice. Computers & Education, 56(2), 403-417.
Koç-Dudak, Ö. & Yavuz, S. (2023). Fen eğitimi alanında argümantasyon tabanlı bilim öğrenme (ATBÖ) yaklaşımı ile ilgili araştırmalar üzerine bir içerik analizi [A content analysis on research on argumentation-based science learning approach in science education]. Araştırma ve Deneyim Dergisi, 8(1), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.47214/adeder.1193961.
Kramarski, B. & Mevarech, Z. R. (2003). Enhancing mathematical reasoning in the classroom: the effects of cooperative learning and metacognitive training. American Educational Research Journal, 40(1), 281-310. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312040001281.
Kushki, A., Nassaji, H., & Rahimi, M. (2022). Interventionist and interactionist dynamic assessment of argumentative writing in an EFL program. System, 107, 102800. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2022.102800.
Mercier, H., & Sperber, D. (2011). Why do humans reason? Arguments for an argumentative theory. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 34(2), 57-74.
Merigó, J. M., Pedrycz, W., Weber, R., & de la Sotta, C. (2018). Fifty years of Information Sciences: A bibliometric overview. Information Sciences, 432, 245-268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2017.11.054
Molnar, D., & Šplihal, I. (2024). Writing strategies used by Croatian students in EFL argumentative essays. Jezikoslovlje, 25(2.), 297-323. https://doi.org/10.29162/jez.2024.11.
Muslu, Ü. (2018). Global literatürde antropometri ve plastik cerrahi birlikteliği: 1975 ve 2017 yılları arasındaki akademik yayınların bibliyometrik analizi [The association of anthropometry and plastic surgery in the global literature: A bibliometric analysis of academic publications between 1975 and 2017]. Hitit Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 11(2), 1321-1336. https://doi.org/10.17218/hititsosbil.462544.
Newell, G. E., Beach, R., Smith, J., & VanDerHeide, J. (2011). Teaching and learning argumentative reading and writing: A review of research. Reading Research Quarterly, 46(3), 273-304.
Noroozi, O. (2022). The role of students’ epistemic beliefs for their argumentation performance in higher education. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 60(4), 501–512. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2022.2092188.
Noroozi, O., Weinberger, A., Biemans, H. J., Mulder, M., & Chizari, M. (2012). Argumentation-based computer supported collaborative learning (ABCSCL): A synthesis of 15 years of research. Educational Research Review, 7(2), 79-106.
Osborne, J., Erduran, S. & Simon, S. (2004). Enhancing the quality of argumentation in school science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41, 994-1020. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20035.
Özkaya, A. (2019). Bibliometric analysis of the publications made in STEM education area. Bartın University Journal of Faculty of Education, 8(2), 590-628. https://doi.org/10.14686/buefad.450825.
Pabuçcu-Akış, A. (2024). Bibliometric analysis on argumentation research in chemistry education. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Buca Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, (62), 3336-3355. https://doi.org/10.53444/deubefd.1506441.
Pradana, M., Elisa, H. P., & Syarifuddin, S. (2023). Discussing ChatGPT in education: A literature review and bibliometric analysis. Cogent Education, 10(2), 2243134. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2023.2243134.
Rahma, A., Wibowo, F. C., & Budi, E. (2024, May). Student argumentation skill in physics learning: Bibliometric analysis. In AIP Conference Proceedings, 3116(1). AIP Publishing.
Rehn, C., Gornitzki, C., Larsson, A. & Wadskog, D. (2014). Bibliometric handbook for Karolinska Institutet. Karolinska Institutet University Library Publications. https://kib.ki.se/sites/default/files/bibliometric_handbook_2014.pdf.
Rojas-Sánchez, M. A., Palos-Sánchez, P. R., & Folgado-Fernández, J. A. (2023). Systematic literature review and bibliometric analysis on virtual reality and education. Education and Information Technologies, 28(1), 155-192. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11167-5.
Sadler, T. D. (2004). Informal reasoning regarding socioscientific issues: A critical review of research. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(5), 513-536. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20009.
Sadler, T. D. (2006). Promoting discourse and argumentation in science teacher education. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 17(4), 323–346. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-006-9025-4.
Selvitopu, A., Kaya, M. & Taş, A. (2018). Eğitim bilimleri alanı bilimsel yayın performansı: G-20 ülkeleri ve Türkiye [Scientific publication performance in educational sciences: G-20 countries and Turkey]. Electronic Turkish Studies, 13(15), 383-399. https://doi.org/10.7827/TurkishStudies.13379.
Şeref, İ. & Karagöz, B. (2019). Türkçe eğitimi akademik alanına ilişkin bir değerlendirme: Web of Science veri tabanına dayalı bibliyometrik inceleme [An evaluation of the academic field of Turkish education: A bibliometric review based on Web of Science database]. Dil Eğitimi ve Araştırmaları Dergisi, 5(2), 213- 231. https://doi.org/10.31464/jlere.578224.
Suliyanah, Amiruddin, M. Z., & Prahani, B. K. (2024). Scientific argumentations research for last 10 years: analysis bibliometric. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 13(4), 2126-2138. http://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v13i4.26374.
Swacha, J. (2021). State of research on gamification in education: A bibliometric survey. Education Sciences, 11(2), 69. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11020069.
ten Peze, A., Janssen, T., Rijlarsdam, G., & van Weijen, D. (2021). Writing creative and argumentative texts: What’s the difference?: Exploring how task type affects students’ writing behaviour and performance. L1-Educational Studies in Language and Literature, 21(1), 1-38. https://doi.org/10.17239/L1ESLL-2021.21.01.11.
Thanuskodi, S. (2010). Journal of Social Sciences: A bibliometric study. Journal of Social Sciences, 24(2), 77-80.
Toulmin, S. (1958). The uses of argument. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Uluay, G. & Aydın, A. (2018). Yedinci sınıf öğrencilerine kuvvet ve hareket ünitesinin öğretilmesinde argümantasyon odaklı öğrenme sürecinin akademik başarıya etkisi [The effect of argumentation-oriented learning process on academic achievement in teaching force and motion unit to seventh grade students]. Abant İzzet Baysal Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 18 (3), 1779-1799. https://doi.org/10.17240/aibuefd.2018.18.39790-471189.
Ural, A., & Özdemir, A. (2025). A bibliometric study on the literature of critical pedagogy: Trends, themes, and future directions. Yaşadıkça Eğitim, 39(1), 98-116. https://doi.org/10.33308/26674874.2025391793.
Usta, M. E., Doğan, Ü., & Abdurrezzak, S. (2025). Bibliometric analysis of studies on sustainability in education. Journal of Education and Future, (27), 161-176. https://doi.org/10.30786/jef.1498481.
Walshaw, M. & Anthony, G. (2008). The teacher’s role in classroom discourse: A review of recent research into mathematics classrooms. Review of Educational Research, 78(3), 516-551.
Wang, L., Huang, J., Sun, M., Zheng, X., & Xia, X. (2022). A scope review of computer-supported collaborative argumentation in the past decade. ICOME 2022, August 3–4, Hawai.
Xu, W. (2023). Argumentative Writing in a Second Language: Perspectives on Research and Pedagogy, Alan Hirvela, Diane Belcher (Eds.), University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor.
Yackel, E., & Cobb, P. (1996). Sociomathematical norms, argumentation, and autonomy in mathematics. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 27(4), 458–477. https://doi.org/10.2307/749877.
Yalçın, H. & Yayla, K. (2016). Teknolojik pedagojik alan bilgisi konusunda yapılan araştırmaların bilimetrik analizi ve bilimsel iletişim [Scientometric analysis of research on technological pedagogical content knowledge and scientific communication]. Eğitim ve Bilim, 41(188), 291-307. https://doi.org/10.15390/EB.2016.6746.
Yeşiltaş, H. M., Çelikoğlu, M., & Taş, E. (2024). Fen eğitiminde sosyobilimsel konulara yönelik çalışmaların bibliyometrik analizi [Bibliometric analysis of studies on socioscientific issues in science education]. Ordu Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 1(1), 35-57.
Yıldırım, F. S. (2020). Argümantasyon odaklı öğrenme yaklaşımıyla ilgili bilimsel çalışmalara bakış [Overview of scientific studies on argumentation-oriented learning approach]. Kastamonu Education Journal, 28(5), 2058-2070. https://doi.org/10.24106/kefdergi.770439.
Yılmaz, K. (2021). Sosyal bilimlerde ve eğitim bilimlerinde sistematik derleme, meta değerlendirme ve bibliyometrik analizler [Systematic review, meta-evaluation and bibliometric analysis in social and educational sciences]. Manas Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 10(2), 1457-1490. https://doi.org/10.33206/mjss.791537.
Yoon, H. J. (2021). Interactions in EFL argumentative writing: Effects of topic, L1 background, and L2 proficiency on interactional metadiscourse. Reading and Writing, 34(3), 705-725. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-020-10085-7.
Zohar, A. & Nemet, F. (2002). Fostering students' knowledge and argumentation skills through dilemmas in human genetics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39 35-62. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.10008.
Downloads
How to Cite
Published
Issue
Section
Statistics
License
Copyright (c) 2025 İzzet Şeref
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
