Admoko, S., Mukhayyarotin, N. R. J., & Hariyono, E. (2021, December). Bibliometric profile of science education research on argumentation and the contribution of Indonesia. In International Joint Conference on Science and Engineering 2021 (IJCSE 2021) (pp. 502-509). Atlantis Press.
Al, U. & Coştur, R. (2007). Türk Psikoloji Dergisi’nin bibliyometrik profile [Bibliometric profile of Turkish Journal of Psychology]. Türk Kütüphaneciliği, 21(2), 142-163.
Al, U. & Tonta, Y. (2004). Atıf Analizi: Hacettepe Üniversitesi kütüphanecilik bölümü tezlerinde atıf yapılan kaynaklar [Citation Analysis: Sources cited in Hacettepe University Department of Librarianship theses]. Bilgi Dünyası, 5(1), 19-47.
Al, U. (2012). Avrupa Birliği ülkeleri ve Türkiye’nin yayın ve atıf performansı [Publication and citation performance of European Union countries and Turkey]. Bilig, 62, 1-20.
Alsharif, A. H., Salleh, N. Z. M., Baharun, R., & Alharthi, R. H. E. (2021). Neuromarketing research in the last five years: A bibliometric analysis. Cogent Business & Management, 8(1), 1978620. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2021.1978620
Arslan, G. & Tüysüz, M. (2023). Hikâyelendirme tekniği ile desteklenen argümantasyon temelli eğitim kapsamında öğretilen sosyo-bilimsel konuların 8. sınıf öğrencilerinin, eleştirel düşünme becerilerine, fene karşı tutumlarına ve argümantasyon seviyelerinin gelişimlerine olan etkisinin incelenmesi [Investigating the effect of socio-scientific topics taught within the scope of argumentation-based education supported by storytelling technique on 8th grade students' critical thinking skills, attitudes towards science and development of argumentation levels]. Cumhuriyet Uluslararası Eğitim Dergisi, 12 (1), 104-118. https://doi.org/10.30703/cije.1170029
Ashel, H., Hamidah, I., Anwar, S., & Muslim, M. (2024). Research trends and opportunities of argumentation based learning for solving problems in physics learning: A bibliometric analysis. Jurnal Eksakta Pendidikan (JEP), 8(2), 99-114. https://doi.org/10.24036/jep/vol8-iss2/941
Bamberg, M. & Georgakopoulou, A. (2008). Small stories as a new perspective in narrative and identity analysis. Text & Talk, 28(3), 377-396. https://doi.org/10.1515/TEXT.2008.018
Becerikli, Y. S. (2013). Türkiye’de sağlık iletişimi üzerine yazılan lisansüstü tezlerin bibliyometrik analizi eleştirel bir bakış [A critical review of bibliometric analysis of postgraduate theses on health communication in Turkey]. Ankara Sağlık Hizmetleri Dergisi, 12(2), 25-36.
Bråten, I., Britt, M. A., Strømsø, H. I., & Rouet, J. F. (2011). The role of epistemic beliefs in the comprehension of multiple expository texts: Toward an integrated model. Educational Psychologist, 46(1), 48-70.
Çavuşoğlu, E. C., & Akkaş, Ö. A. (2025). Yoğun bakım hemşirelerinin enteral beslenme uygulamaları konusunda yapılan araştırmaların bibliyometrik analizi: Web of Science örneği [Bibliometric analysis of studies on enteral nutrition practices of intensive care nurses: Web of Science example]. Sağlık Bilimlerinde Değer, 15(1), 127-135. https://doi.org/10.33631/sabd.1540265
Chuang, P. L., & Yan, X. (2023). Connecting source use and argumentation in L2 integrated argumentative writing performance. Journal of Second Language Writing, 60, 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. jslw.2023.101003
Clark, D. B., Sampson, V., Weinberger, A., & Erkens, G. (2007). Analytic frameworks for assessing dialogic argumentation in online learning environments. Educational Psychology Review, 19, 343-374.
Dawson, V., & Venville, G. J. (2009). High‐school students’ informal reasoning and argumentation about biotechnology: An indicator of scientific literacy? International Journal of Science Education, 31(11), 1421-1445. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690801992870
Deane, P. (2013). On the relation between automated essay scoring and modern views of the writing construct. Assessing Writing, 18(1), 7-24.
Degano, C. (2016). Corpus linguistics and argumentation: Retrieving argumentative patterns in UK prime ministerial debates. Journal of Argumentation in Context, 5(2), 113-138. https://doi.org/10.1075/jaic.5.2.01deg.
Deng, Z., Uccelli, P., & Snow, C. (2022). Diversity of Advanced Sentence Structures (DASS) in writing predicts argumentative writing quality and receptive academic language skills of fifth-to-eighth grade students. Assessing Writing, 53, 100649. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2022.100649.
Driver, R., Newton, P., & Osborne, J. (2000). Establishing the norms of scientific argumentation in classrooms. Science Education, 84(3), 287-312.
Durkin, K. (2008). The adaptation of East Asian masters students to western norms of critical thinking and argumentation in the UK. Intercultural Education, 19(1), 15-27.
Ellegaard, O., & Wallin, J. A. (2015). The bibliometric analysis of scholarly production: How great is the impact?. Scientometrics, 105, 1809-1831. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1645-z.
Engle, R. A., & Conant, F. R. (2002). Guiding principles for fostering productive disciplinary engagement: Explaining an emergent argument in a community of learners classroom. Cognition and instruction, 20(4), 399-483.
Erişen, O. (2025). Dijital dönüşüm ışığında iç denetim üzerine bibliyometrik analiz yaklaşımı [A bibliometric analysis approach on internal audit in the light of digital transformation]. Denetişim, (32), 108-130. https://doi.org/10.58348/denetisim.1530516.
Erkol, M., Kışoğlu, M., & Gül, Ş. (2017). Argümantasyon tabanlı bilim öğrenme yaklaşımı rapor formatının öğretmen adaylarının başarılarına ve fen bilgisi laboratuvarına yönelik tutumlarına etkisi [The effect of argumentation-based science learning approach report format on pre-service teachers’ achievement and attitudes towards science laboratory]. İlköğretim Online, 16(2), 614-627. https://doi.org/10.17051/ilkonline.2017.304723.
Evagorou, M. & Osborne, J. (2013), Exploring young students' collaborative argumentation within a socioscientific issue. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 50, 209-237. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21076
Glänzel, W., & Schoepflin, U. (1999). A bibliometric study of reference literature in the sciences and social sciences. Information Processing & Management, 35(1), 31-44.
Gordon, N. J., Nucci, L. P., West, C. K., Hoerr, W. A., Uğuroğlu, M. E., Vukosavich, P. & Tsai, S. L. (1984). Productivity and citations of educational research: Using educational psychology as the data base. Educational Researcher, 13(7), 14-20. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X013007014.
Gregory, M. & Holloway, M. (2005). The debate as a pedagogic tool in social policy for social work students. Social Work Education, 24(6), 617-637.
Hallinger, P., & Chatpinyakoop, C. (2019). A bibliometric review of research on higher education for sustainable development, 1998–2018. Sustainability, 11(8), 2401. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11082401.
Hand, B., & Keys, C. W. (1999). Inquiry investigation: A new approach to laboratory reports. The Science Teacher, 66(4), 27.
Hasançebi, F. (2014). Argümantasyon tabanlı bilim öğrenme yaklaşımının öğrencilerin fen başarıları, argüman oluşturma becerileri ve bireysel gelişimleri üzerine etkisi [The effect of argumentation-based science learning approach on students’ science achievement, argumentation skills and individual development], [Unpublished doctoral thesis]. Atatürk University.
Hotamışlı, M. & Erem, I. (2014). Muhasebe ve Finansman Dergisi'nde yayınlanan makalelerin bibliyometrik analizi [Bibliometric analysis of articles published in Journal of Accounting and Finance]. Journal of Accounting & Finance, 63, 1-19. https://doi.org/10.25095/mufad.396474.
Huang, C., Yang, C., Wang, S., Wu, W., Su, J., & Liang, C. (2020). Evolution of topics in education research: A systematic review using bibliometric analysis. Educational Review, 72(3), 281-297. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2019.1566212.
Jeliazkova, M. & Westerheijden, D. F. (2002). Systemic adaptation to a changing environment: Towards a next generation of quality assurance models. Higher Education, 44, 433–448. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1019834105675.
Johns, A. M. (2017). Augmenting argumentation in second language writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 36, 79-80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2017.05.005.
Kartika, H., Budiarto, M.T., Fuad, Y., & Bonyah, E. (2023). Bibliometrics analysis of research on argumentation in mathematics education. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science, and Technology (IJEMST), 11(5), 1346-1365. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijemst.2904.
Khan, A., Goodell, J. W., Hassan, M. K., & Paltrinieri, A. (2022). A bibliometric review of finance bibliometric papers. Finance Research Letters, 47, 102520. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2021.102520.
Kıdak, L. B., Demir, H. & Özdemir, E. (2017). Bilimsel haritalama yöntemiyle hastane yönetimi alanındaki tematik değişimin analizi [Analyzing thematic change in the field of hospital management using scientific mapping]. Genel Tıp Dergisi, 27(2), 43-50.
Kılıçaslan, G., Can, H., & Çetinkaya, T. (2025). Açık ve uzaktan öğrenme ortamlarında öğrenim terki üzerine yapılan çalışmaların bibliyometrik analizi: Scopus örneği [A bibliometric analysis of studies on learning dropout in open and distance learning environments: Scopus example]. Açıköğretim Uygulamaları ve Araştırmaları Dergisi, 11(1), 62-87. https://doi.org/10.51948/auad.1556844.
Kim, J. S., Relyea, J. E., Burkhauser, M. A., Scherer, E., & Rich, P. (2021). Improving elementary grade students’ science and social studies vocabulary knowledge depth, reading comprehension, and argumentative writing: A conceptual replication. Educational Psychology Review, 33(4), 1935-1964. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-021-09609-6.
Kim, M. C. & Hannafin, M. J. (2011). Scaffolding problem solving in technology-enhanced learning environments (TELEs): Bridging research and theory with practice. Computers & Education, 56(2), 403-417.
Koç-Dudak, Ö. & Yavuz, S. (2023). Fen eğitimi alanında argümantasyon tabanlı bilim öğrenme (ATBÖ) yaklaşımı ile ilgili araştırmalar üzerine bir içerik analizi [A content analysis on research on argumentation-based science learning approach in science education]. Araştırma ve Deneyim Dergisi, 8(1), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.47214/adeder.1193961.
Kramarski, B. & Mevarech, Z. R. (2003). Enhancing mathematical reasoning in the classroom: the effects of cooperative learning and metacognitive training. American Educational Research Journal, 40(1), 281-310. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312040001281.
Kushki, A., Nassaji, H., & Rahimi, M. (2022). Interventionist and interactionist dynamic assessment of argumentative writing in an EFL program. System, 107, 102800. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2022.102800.
Mercier, H., & Sperber, D. (2011). Why do humans reason? Arguments for an argumentative theory. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 34(2), 57-74.
Merigó, J. M., Pedrycz, W., Weber, R., & de la Sotta, C. (2018). Fifty years of Information Sciences: A bibliometric overview. Information Sciences, 432, 245-268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2017.11.054
Molnar, D., & Šplihal, I. (2024). Writing strategies used by Croatian students in EFL argumentative essays. Jezikoslovlje, 25(2.), 297-323. https://doi.org/10.29162/jez.2024.11.
Muslu, Ü. (2018). Global literatürde antropometri ve plastik cerrahi birlikteliği: 1975 ve 2017 yılları arasındaki akademik yayınların bibliyometrik analizi [The association of anthropometry and plastic surgery in the global literature: A bibliometric analysis of academic publications between 1975 and 2017]. Hitit Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 11(2), 1321-1336. https://doi.org/10.17218/hititsosbil.462544.
Newell, G. E., Beach, R., Smith, J., & VanDerHeide, J. (2011). Teaching and learning argumentative reading and writing: A review of research. Reading Research Quarterly, 46(3), 273-304.
Noroozi, O. (2022). The role of students’ epistemic beliefs for their argumentation performance in higher education. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 60(4), 501–512. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2022.2092188.
Noroozi, O., Weinberger, A., Biemans, H. J., Mulder, M., & Chizari, M. (2012). Argumentation-based computer supported collaborative learning (ABCSCL): A synthesis of 15 years of research. Educational Research Review, 7(2), 79-106.
Osborne, J., Erduran, S. & Simon, S. (2004). Enhancing the quality of argumentation in school science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41, 994-1020. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20035.
Özkaya, A. (2019). Bibliometric analysis of the publications made in STEM education area. Bartın University Journal of Faculty of Education, 8(2), 590-628. https://doi.org/10.14686/buefad.450825.
Pabuçcu-Akış, A. (2024). Bibliometric analysis on argumentation research in chemistry education. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Buca Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, (62), 3336-3355. https://doi.org/10.53444/deubefd.1506441.
Pradana, M., Elisa, H. P., & Syarifuddin, S. (2023). Discussing ChatGPT in education: A literature review and bibliometric analysis. Cogent Education, 10(2), 2243134. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2023.2243134.
Rahma, A., Wibowo, F. C., & Budi, E. (2024, May). Student argumentation skill in physics learning: Bibliometric analysis. In AIP Conference Proceedings, 3116(1). AIP Publishing.
Rehn, C., Gornitzki, C., Larsson, A. & Wadskog, D. (2014). Bibliometric handbook for Karolinska Institutet. Karolinska Institutet University Library Publications. https://kib.ki.se/sites/default/files/bibliometric_handbook_2014.pdf.
Rojas-Sánchez, M. A., Palos-Sánchez, P. R., & Folgado-Fernández, J. A. (2023). Systematic literature review and bibliometric analysis on virtual reality and education. Education and Information Technologies, 28(1), 155-192. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11167-5.
Sadler, T. D. (2004). Informal reasoning regarding socioscientific issues: A critical review of research. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(5), 513-536. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20009.
Sadler, T. D. (2006). Promoting discourse and argumentation in science teacher education. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 17(4), 323–346. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-006-9025-4.
Selvitopu, A., Kaya, M. & Taş, A. (2018). Eğitim bilimleri alanı bilimsel yayın performansı: G-20 ülkeleri ve Türkiye [Scientific publication performance in educational sciences: G-20 countries and Turkey]. Electronic Turkish Studies, 13(15), 383-399. https://doi.org/10.7827/TurkishStudies.13379.
Şeref, İ. & Karagöz, B. (2019). Türkçe eğitimi akademik alanına ilişkin bir değerlendirme: Web of Science veri tabanına dayalı bibliyometrik inceleme [An evaluation of the academic field of Turkish education: A bibliometric review based on Web of Science database]. Dil Eğitimi ve Araştırmaları Dergisi, 5(2), 213- 231. https://doi.org/10.31464/jlere.578224.
Suliyanah, Amiruddin, M. Z., & Prahani, B. K. (2024). Scientific argumentations research for last 10 years: analysis bibliometric. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 13(4), 2126-2138. http://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v13i4.26374.
Swacha, J. (2021). State of research on gamification in education: A bibliometric survey. Education Sciences, 11(2), 69. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11020069.
ten Peze, A., Janssen, T., Rijlarsdam, G., & van Weijen, D. (2021). Writing creative and argumentative texts: What’s the difference?: Exploring how task type affects students’ writing behaviour and performance. L1-Educational Studies in Language and Literature, 21(1), 1-38. https://doi.org/10.17239/L1ESLL-2021.21.01.11.
Thanuskodi, S. (2010). Journal of Social Sciences: A bibliometric study. Journal of Social Sciences, 24(2), 77-80.
Toulmin, S. (1958). The uses of argument. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Uluay, G. & Aydın, A. (2018). Yedinci sınıf öğrencilerine kuvvet ve hareket ünitesinin öğretilmesinde argümantasyon odaklı öğrenme sürecinin akademik başarıya etkisi [The effect of argumentation-oriented learning process on academic achievement in teaching force and motion unit to seventh grade students]. Abant İzzet Baysal Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 18 (3), 1779-1799. https://doi.org/10.17240/aibuefd.2018.18.39790-471189.
Ural, A., & Özdemir, A. (2025). A bibliometric study on the literature of critical pedagogy: Trends, themes, and future directions. Yaşadıkça Eğitim, 39(1), 98-116. https://doi.org/10.33308/26674874.2025391793.
Usta, M. E., Doğan, Ü., & Abdurrezzak, S. (2025). Bibliometric analysis of studies on sustainability in education. Journal of Education and Future, (27), 161-176. https://doi.org/10.30786/jef.1498481.
Walshaw, M. & Anthony, G. (2008). The teacher’s role in classroom discourse: A review of recent research into mathematics classrooms. Review of Educational Research, 78(3), 516-551.
Wang, L., Huang, J., Sun, M., Zheng, X., & Xia, X. (2022). A scope review of computer-supported collaborative argumentation in the past decade. ICOME 2022, August 3–4, Hawai.
Xu, W. (2023). Argumentative Writing in a Second Language: Perspectives on Research and Pedagogy, Alan Hirvela, Diane Belcher (Eds.), University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor.
Yackel, E., & Cobb, P. (1996). Sociomathematical norms, argumentation, and autonomy in mathematics. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 27(4), 458–477. https://doi.org/10.2307/749877.
Yalçın, H. & Yayla, K. (2016). Teknolojik pedagojik alan bilgisi konusunda yapılan araştırmaların bilimetrik analizi ve bilimsel iletişim [Scientometric analysis of research on technological pedagogical content knowledge and scientific communication]. Eğitim ve Bilim, 41(188), 291-307. https://doi.org/10.15390/EB.2016.6746.
Yeşiltaş, H. M., Çelikoğlu, M., & Taş, E. (2024). Fen eğitiminde sosyobilimsel konulara yönelik çalışmaların bibliyometrik analizi [Bibliometric analysis of studies on socioscientific issues in science education]. Ordu Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 1(1), 35-57.
Yıldırım, F. S. (2020). Argümantasyon odaklı öğrenme yaklaşımıyla ilgili bilimsel çalışmalara bakış [Overview of scientific studies on argumentation-oriented learning approach]. Kastamonu Education Journal, 28(5), 2058-2070. https://doi.org/10.24106/kefdergi.770439.
Yılmaz, K. (2021). Sosyal bilimlerde ve eğitim bilimlerinde sistematik derleme, meta değerlendirme ve bibliyometrik analizler [Systematic review, meta-evaluation and bibliometric analysis in social and educational sciences]. Manas Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 10(2), 1457-1490. https://doi.org/10.33206/mjss.791537.
Yoon, H. J. (2021). Interactions in EFL argumentative writing: Effects of topic, L1 background, and L2 proficiency on interactional metadiscourse. Reading and Writing, 34(3), 705-725. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-020-10085-7.
Zohar, A. & Nemet, F. (2002). Fostering students' knowledge and argumentation skills through dilemmas in human genetics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39 35-62. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.10008.
0000-0002-2379-1373
View Profile