Graduate students and AI: Insights into academic writing practices
Authors
-
Berkay AktepeInstitute Of Social Sciences, Primary Education, Ordu University, Ordu, Türkiye
-
Seher ÇetinkayaEducation Faculty, Department of Primary Education, Ordu University, Ordu, Turkey
DOI:
10.58583/EM.4.2.2Keywords:
Artificial intelligence, Writing support tools, Academic writing practices, AI-assisted academic writing, Higher educationAbstract
This study aims to examine graduate students’ perceptions of artificial intelligence–based tools, their practices in using these tools during academic writing processes, and their ethical evaluations related to such use. The research was conducted using qualitative research design. Data was collected through semi-structured interviews with 11 graduate students, and content analysis was employed to analyze the data. The analysis yielded four main themes covering the purposes of AI tool usage, their contributions to academic achievement and learning experience, limitations encountered during use, and ethical considerations. The findings show that students use AI tools intensively, particularly in processes such as literature review, writing and language development, idea generation, and structural framework creation. It was also determined that AI saves time, increases academic productivity, and supports the learning process. However, loss of originality, verifiability issues, content errors, and ethical sensitivities were expressed by students as significant limitations. Participants stated that these tools help them save time, contribute to idea generation, and support written expression. However, some participants emphasized the importance of using AI tools cautiously in terms of originality, accuracy, and ethical considerations. They expressed concerns that relying entirely on these systems for content generation may lead to uncertainty or ambiguity. Overall participants perceive AI tools as supportive instruments and emphasize that they should be used carefully and responsibly.
Downloads
References
Abdullah, A. D., Qiu, X., Li, H., & Kabilan, M. K. (2025). It becomes very intelligent: ChatGPT as an academic reading tool for postgraduates. Reading Research Quarterly, 60(4), e70058. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.70058
Akşab, Ş., & Seggie, F. N. (2024). Artificial intelligence in higher education: teaching, research and community service perspectives. Journal of Theory and Practice in Education, 20(2), 29-45. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/3813877
Alsamhori, A. R., & Alnaimat, F. (2024). Artificial intelligence in writing and research: Ethical implications and best practices. Central Asian Journal of Medical Hypotheses and Ethics, 5(4), 259–268. https://doi.org/10.47316/cajmhe.2024.5.4.02
Altıntop, M. (2023). Academic text writing with artificial intelligence/smart learning technologies: the CHATGPT example. Journal of Suleyman Demirel University Institute of Social Sciences, 46, 186–211. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/sbe/issue/79677/1254533
Andika, J. D., Waly, M. M., Yulia, Y., & Reswari, G. P. A. (2025). Scrutinizing English academic writing skills: Indonesian postgraduate students' challenges and strategies in an ai-empowered era. Journal of Languages and Language Teaching, 13(2), 551-567. https://doi.org/10.33394/jollt.v13i2.12884
Benzer, R., & Benzer, S. (2021 the opinions of informatics graduate students on artificial intelligence. Electronic Journal of Social Sciences, 6(10), 53-83. http://dx.doi.org/10.29228/sbe.62139
Büyükada, S. (2024). Examining the ethical aspects of using artificial intelligence in academic writing: the case of ChatGPT. Rize Theology Journal, 26(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.32950/rid.1337208
Casal, J. E., & Kessler, M. (2023). Can linguists distinguish between ChatGPT/AI and human writing?: A study of research ethics and academic publishing. Research Methods in Applied Linguistics, 2(3), 100068. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rmal.2023.100068
Chauke, T., Mkhize, T., Methi, L., & Dlamini, N. (2024). Postgraduate students’ perceptions on the benefits associated with artificial intelligence tools on academic success: In case of ChatGPT AI tool. Journal Of Curriculum Studies Research, 6(1), 44-59. https://doi.org/10.46303/jcsr.2024.4
Chen, L., Chen, P., & Lin, Z. (2020). Artificial intelligence in education: A review. IEEE Access, 8, 75264-75278. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2988510
Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2021). Araştırma tasarımı [Research design]. Nobel.
Davis, A.J. (2024). AI rising in higher education: opportunities, risks and limitations. Asian Education and Development Studies, 13(4), 307–319, https://doi.org/10.1108/AEDS-01-2024-0017
Eltahir, M. E., & Babiker, F. M. E. (2024). The influence of artificial intelligence tools on student performance in e-learning environments: case study. Electronic Journal of E-Learning, 22(9), 91–110. https://doi.org/10.34190/ejel.22.9.3639
Gumpenberger, T., Glänzel, W., & Gorraiz, J. (2022). The role of AI in reference management tools: A comparative analysis of Zotero, Mendeley, and EndNote. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 48(6), 102715. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2022.102715
Han, P.-C. (2025). Artificial intelligence in academic research: Applications, challenges, and future directions. In Foundations and Frameworks for AI in Education (pp. 451–476). https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3373-2397-8.ch015
Hartman Douglas, K. (2024). On the effective and ethical use of AI in academic writing. Philological Information, 75(4), 9–23. https://doi.org/10.48371/PHILS.2024.4.75.026
Kasneci, E., Sessler, K., Küchemann, S., Bannert, M., Dementieva, D., Fischer, F., * … Kasneci, G. (2023). ChatGPT for good? On opportunities and challenges of large language models for education. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 26(1), 99–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2023.102274
Kudritskaya, M., Plastinina, N., Kushnina, L., Plekhanova, Y., Matytcina, M., & Stepanova, M. (2024, June). Balancing innovation with ethics: AI applications for enhancing language competence in academic writing and reading. In 2024 4th International Conference on Technology Enhanced Learning in Higher Education (TELE) (pp. 380-385). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/TELE62556.2024.10605668
Kvale, S., & Brinkmann, S. (2009). InterViews: Learning the craft of qualitative research interviewing (2nd ed.). Sage Publications, Inc.
Merriam, S. B., & Grenier, R. S. (2019). Qualitative research in practice: Examples for discussion and analysis. John Wiley & Sons.
Michel-Villarreal, R., Vilalta-Perdomo, E., Salinas-Navarro, D. E., Thierry-Aguilera, R., & Gerardou, F. S. (2023). Challenges and opportunities of generative ai for higher education as explained by ChatGPT. Education Sciences, 13(9), 856-876. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13090856
Mwita, K., & Mwilongo, N. H. (2025). The use of artificial intelligence in academic writing: what is ethical and what is not. Journal of Digital Learning and Education, 5(1), 17-27. https://doi.org/10.52562/jdle.v5i1.1318
Okun, O., Yüksel, M., Karahan, M. O., & Bozkurt, R. (2023). The new face of academic publishing: chatgpt and ethics discussions. International Journal of Commerce, Industry and Entrepreneurship Studies 3(1), 39-50. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8176080
Oubibi, M., Hryshayeva, K., & Huang, R. (2025). Enhancing postgraduate digital academic writing proficiency: the interplay of artificial intelligence tools and ChatGPT. Interactive Learning Environments, 33(6), 3940–3958. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2025.2454445
Pratiwi, H., Suherman, Hasruddin, & Ridha, M. (2025). Between shortcut and ethics: navigating the use of artificial intelligence in academic writing among Indonesian doctoral students. European Journal of Education, 60(2), e70083. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.70083
Russell, S., & Norvig, P. (2020). Artificial intelligence: A modern approach (4th ed.). Pearson.
Saienko, Y., Kyrychenko, V., Brona, O., Malii, A., & Pasichnyk, V. (2025). Generative AI tools in higher education: benefits, limitations, and ethical risks. International Journal on Culture, History, and Religion, 7(SI1.2), 595–615. https://doi.org/10.63931/ijchr.v7iSI1.2.517
Schreier, M. (2012). Qualitative content analysis in practice. SAGE Publications.
Shimray, S. R., & Subaveerapandiyan, A. (2025). Artificial Intelligence in Academic Writing and Research: Adoption and Effectiveness. Open Information Science, 9(1), 20250026. https://doi.org/10.1515/opis-2025-0026
Tisdell, E. J., Merriam, S. B., & Stuckey-Peyrot, H. L. (2025). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. John Wiley & Sons.
Tran, H. N., Le, T. T. N., & Tran, V. B. U. (2025). AI tools in learning academic writing: benefits and challenges for ma students in the English language studies at the industrial university of ho chi Minh city. International Journal of AI in Language Education, 2(1), 74-91. https://doi.org/10.54855/ijaile.25215
TÜBİTAK. (2025). Türkiye Bilimsel ve Teknolojik Araştırma Kurumu. [Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey] Destek süreçlerinde üretken yapay zekânın sorumlu ve güvenilir kullanımı rehberi [A guide to the responsible and trustworthy use of generative artificial intelligence in support processes.]. https://tubitak.gov.tr/tr/kurumsal/hakkimizda/uretken-yapay-zeka-rehberi
Turing, A. (1950). Computing machinery and intelligence. Mind, 59(236), 433–460. https://doi.org/10.1093/mind/lix.236.433
UNESCO. (2021). AI and education: Guidance for policymakers. UNESCO Press. https://doi.org/10.54675/PCSP7350
Uslu, B. (2023). Usage areas of artificial intelligence in universities: potential benefits and prospective challenges. Journal of Theory and Practice in Education, 19(2), 224-236. https://doi.org/10.17244/eku.1355304
VanLehn, K. (2011). The relative effectiveness of human tutoring, intelligent tutoring systems, and other tutoring systems. Educational Psychologist, 46(4), 197–221. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2011.611369
Vural Yılmaz, D. (2023). Yapay zekâ ve yükseköğretim. In M. Aktaş (Ed.), Yapay zekâ yönetim ve eğitim [Artificial intelligence in management and education] (pp. 205-233). Nobel Yayınları.
Winberg, C., Engel-Hills, P., & Winberg, S. L. (2024). “Am I in control of my own writing?” Training postgraduate candidates in the responsible use of generative artificial intelligence in academic writing. African Journal of Inter/Multidisciplinary Studies, 6(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.51415/ajims.v6i1.1512
Yakut, S. G., Aslan, H. K., & Küsen, G. Y. (2025). Perspective on artificial intelligence: A profile study on the attitudes of university students. Journal of Awareness, 10(1), e2684. https://doi.org/10.26809/joa.2684
Yeşilyurt, S., Dündar, R., & Aydın, M. (2024). Opinions of students continuing their graduate education in social studies education on artificial intelligence. Asya Studies-Academic Social Studies, 8(27), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.31455/asya.1406649
Yıldırım, A., & Şimşek, H. (2018). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri [Qualitative research methods in social sciences] (11th Ed.) Seçkin Yayıncılık.
Downloads
How to Cite
Published
Section
Statistics
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Berkay Aktepe, Seher Çetinkaya
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
