Improving university students' awareness of cookies used by web technologies

Authors

  • Fatih Erdoğdu ORCID
    Computer Technologies, Zonguldak Bülent Ecevit University, Zonguldak, Turkey
  • Rabia Kervan ORCID
    Computer Technologies, Zonguldak Bülent Ecevit University, Zonguldak, Turkey

DOI:

10.58583/EM.3.2.7

Keywords:

Cookies, Personal data protection, Awareness

Abstract

Web technologies are developing rapidly and although the advantages provided by these technologies are quite numerous, they also bring with them problems related to the security of personal data. Especially, the fact that personal data is obtained by using cookies on websites requires web users to be made aware of this issue. While cookies have important advantages in terms of providing fast and easy access to websites, they also have the ability to record and process what web users read, location information, IP addresses, user device information, e-mail addresses, usernames and passwords. It is not legal to record this data without the explicit consent of the person. However, this situation is generally unknown to users or users who have incomplete information. The aim of this study is to raise awareness of university students who frequently use web technologies about cookies so that they can ensure their personal data security with their own efforts. In line with this purpose, a mixed method study was implemented. 25 university students participated in this study. Participants were determined using the convenience sampling method. Online interactive training consisting of 12 lesson hours was organized for the participants. Since quantitative and qualitative data from the participants were collected simultaneously and support each other, a concurrent mixed method model was applied. Quantitative data were collected with awareness pre-test and post-test, and qualitative data were collected with the interview form. Test scores obtained by a single group at different times were analyzed with the Paired Samples t-Test. Qualitative data were also analyzed by content analysis method. As a result of the study, it was revealed that the participants' awareness levels about cookies increased significantly. In addition, the participants' knowledge about risks, advantages and working principles of cookies increased.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Akan, N. & Tanyeri, E. (2020). Online Behavioral Advertising in the Face of Changing Advertising: A Research from the Internet Users Perspective. Journal of Erciyes Communication, 7(2), 1453-1479. https://doi.org/10.17680/erciyesiletisim.706855

Aksoy, H. C., & Halıcıoğlu, M. (2021). Cookies in EU and Turkish Law: A Comparative Review with respect to Data Protection. The Turkish Journal of Privacy and Data Protection, 3(1), 61-88. Retrieved from https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/kvkd/issue/62960/942910

Anton, A., Earp, J., & Young, J. (2010). How Internet Users’ Privacy Concerns Have Evolved since 2002. IEEE Security and Privacy, 8(1), 21 27. https://doi.org/10.1109/MSP.2010.38

Baki, A., & Gökçek, T. (2012). A General Overview of Mixed Method Researches. Electronic Journal of Social Sciences, 11(42), 1-21. Retrieved from https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/esosder/issue/6156/82721

Baltacı, A. (2018). A Conceptual Review of Sampling Methods and Sample Size Problems in Qualitative Research. Bitlis Eren University Social Science Journal, 7(1), 231-274. Retrieved from https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/bitlissos/issue/38061/399955

Boerman, S. C., Kruikemeier, S., & Zuiderveen Borgesius, F. J. (2017). Online behavioral advertising: A literature review and research agenda. Journal of Advertising, 46(3), 363-376. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2017.1339368

Bozkurt, A. (2013, January). Open and distance education: The effects of Web 2.0 and social networks. Paper presented at the XV. Academic Informatics Conference, Antalya, Turkey, Retrieved from https://ab.org.tr/ab13/kitap/AB2013_Bildiri_Kitap.pdf

Brannen, J. (2005). Mixed methods research: A discussion paper. ESRC National Centre for Research Methods. Retrieved from http://eprints.ncrm.ac.uk/89/1/MethodsReviewPaperNCRM-005.pdf

Büyüköztürk, Ş., Çakmak, E. K., Akgün, Ö. E., Karadeniz, Ş., & Demirel, F. (2017). Scientific research methods. Ankara: Pegem Academy.

Creswell, J. W. (2003). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage

Data Protection Commission (DPC). (2020). Cookies and Other Tracking Technologies (Guidance Note). Retrieved from https://www.dataprotection.ie/sites/default/files/uploads/2020-04/Guidance%20note%20on%20cookies%20and%20other%20tracking%20technologies.pdf

Doğan, B. & Bozkurt, T. (2020). Cookies within the Framework of Personal Data Protection; Types, Uses and Application Examples. Lexpera Blog.

Gais Security (2021, 15 December). What is a Cookie? How Does It Work?. Retrieved from https://www.gaissecurity.com/blog/cookie-nedir-nasil-calisir

Kelly, H. (2005). Games, cookies, and the future of education. Issues in Science and Technology, 21(4), 33-40. https://www.jstor.org/stable/43312563

KVKK. (2016,). Official Gazette (29677, 7 April 2016). Retrieved from https://www.mevzuat.gov.tr/mevzuat?MevzuatNo=6698&MevzuatTur=1&MevzuatTertip=5

Mathews-Hunt, K. (2016). CookieConsumer: Tracking online behavioural advertising in Australia. Computer Law & Security Review, 32(1), 55-90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2015.12.006

McDonald, A. M., & Cranor, L. F. (2010). Beliefs and Behaviors: Internet Users’ Understanding of Behavioral Advertising. TPRC 2010. Retrieved from https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1989092

Nill, A., & Aalberts, R. J. (2014). Legal and ethical challenges of online behavioral targeting in advertising. Journal of Current Issues & Research in Advertising, 35(2), 126-146. https://doi.org/10.1080/10641734.2014.899529

Oktay, H.M. (2009). Implementation of association rules in web usage mining. (Master's thesis, Yıldız Technical University, İstanbul, Turkey). Available from National Thesis Center. (Thesis No: 268305).

Pelau, C., Niculescu, M., & Stanescu, M. (2020). Consumers’ perception on the advantages and disadvantages of cookies and browsing history. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the International Conference on Business Excellence, Romaina, Retrieved from https://intapi.sciendo.com/pdf/10.2478/picbe-2020-0079

Skouma, G. & Léonard, L. (2015). On-line Behavioral Tracking: What May Change After the Legal Reform on Personal Data Protection. In Reforming European Data Protection Law, (pp. 35-40) Law, Governance and Technology (C. 1-20, C. Privacy and Data Protection, ss. 35-63 Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9385-8_2

Taşkaya, M., & Talay, Ö. (2019). Marketing Agents for Digital Surveillance: “Cookies” and “Explicit Consent” in the Use of Cookies. Journal of Akdeniz Communication, (31), 356-376. https://doi.org/10.31123/akil.534603

Torres Hernández, N., & Gallego Arrufat, M. J. (2023). Pre-service teachers’ perceptions of data protection in primary education. Contemporary Educational Technology, 15(1), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/12658

Downloads

How to Cite

Erdoğdu, F., & Kervan, R. (2024). Improving university students’ awareness of cookies used by web technologies. Education Mind, 3(2), 178–188. https://doi.org/10.58583/EM.3.2.7

Published

2024-12-03

Section

Research articles

Statistics

Views: 166
Downloads: 125

License

Copyright (c) 2024 Fatih Erdoğdu, Rabia Kervan

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.